SigPhiSigPhi

Considerazioni inattuali, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner a Bayreuth)

Nietzsche

Lingua:
inglese
Stato:
Opera completa
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Testo pulito
Estensione:
~63.400 parole · 301 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APANietzsche. (n.d.). Considerazioni inattuali, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner a Bayreuth). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth
  • MLANietzsche. "Considerazioni inattuali, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner a Bayreuth)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth.
  • ChicagoNietzsche. Considerazioni inattuali, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner a Bayreuth). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth.

Di che cosa tratta

Il primo volume delle Considerazioni inattuali: contro David Strauss, e Richard Wagner a Bayreuth.

Contesto e storia

L'attacco a Strauss è il Nietzsche polemista allo stato puro: non gli discute la teologia ma la prosa, e il ritratto del «filisteo della cultura» — il borghese istruito che scambia quel che gli piace per quel che è buono — punge ancora. **Nota:** Richard Wagner a Bayreuth compare anche come opera a sé. Non è un doppione: il volume e il saggio singolo sono edizioni diverse e restano tutti e due. Traduzione inglese dall'edizione completa curata da Oscar Levy (1909-1913), quella di pubblico dominio. Ha più di un secolo e si sente. L'originale è TEDESCO, e le citazioni vanno fatte sull'originale: il catalogo ne ha due, Also sprach Zarathustra e Der Wille zur Macht; per il resto qui c'è solo la traduzione.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Come comincia
Public opinion in Germany seems strictly to forbid any allusion to the evil and dangerous consequences of a war, more particularly when the war in question has been a victorious one. Those writers, therefore, command a more ready attention who, regarding this public opinion as final, proceed to vie with each other in their jubilant praise of the war, and of the powerful influences it has brought to bear upon morality, culture, and art. Yet it must be confessed that a great victory is a great danger. Human nature bears a triumph less easily than a defeat; indeed, it might even be urged that it is simpler to gain a victory of this sort than to turn it to such account that it may not ultimately prove a serious rout. But of all evil results due to the last contest with France, the most deplorable, perhaps, is that widespread and even universal error of public opinion and of all who think publicly, that German culture was also victorious in the struggle, and that it should now, therefore, be decked with garlands, as a fit recognition of such extraordinary events and successes. This error is in the highest degree pernicious: not because it is an error,--for there are illusions which are both salutary and blessed,--but because it threatens to convert our victory into a signal defeat. A defeat?--I should say rather, into the uprooting of the "German Mind" for the benefit of the "German Empire." Even supposing that the fight had been between the two cultures, the standard for the value of the victor would still be a very relative one, and, in any case, would certainly not justify such exaggerated triumph or self-glorification. For, in the first place, it would be necessary to ascertain the worth of the conquered culture. This might be very little; in which case, even if the victory had involved the most glorious display of arms, it would still offer no warrant for inordinate rapture.…

Leggi l'opera intera →

← Torna a Nietzsche