SigPhiSigPhi

Моё дальнейшее разочарование в России

Эмма Гольдман

Язык:
английский
Статус:
Полное произведение
Авторство:
Написано автором
Состояние текста:
Шумов сканирования не обнаружено (автоматическая оценка всего текста, вручную не проверялась)
Объём:
~39 800 слов · 189 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
  • APAЭмма Гольдман. (n.d.). My further disillusionment in Russia [Моё дальнейшее разочарование в России]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/emma-goldman/my-further-disillusionment-in-russia
  • MLAЭмма Гольдман. My further disillusionment in Russia [Моё дальнейшее разочарование в России]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/emma-goldman/my-further-disillusionment-in-russia.
  • ChicagoЭмма Гольдман. My further disillusionment in Russia [Моё дальнейшее разочарование в России]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/emma-goldman/my-further-disillusionment-in-russia.

Ссылка на воспроизведённое издание. SigPhi — цифровая репродукция. Год, издатель и переводчик указаны, если известны; «n.d.» означает неизвестный год.

О чём это

Вторая половина русского отчёта, которую американский издатель выпустил отдельно.

Контекст и история

Это не новое сочинение: это заключительные главы «Моего разочарования в России», без предупреждения вырезанные из первого издания. Здесь послесловие, где Голдман делает теоретические выводы: революция не может отделить средства от целей.

Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.

Отрывок из доступного издания
accepted notion, the pogrom wave during the civil war period, between the years 1918 and 1921, under the various Ukrainian governments, was even worse than the most terrible Jewish massacres under the Tsars. There had taken place no pogroms during the Bolshevik régime, but he believed that the atmosphere created by them intensified the anti-Jewish spirit and would some day break out in the wholesale slaughter of the Jews. He did not think that the Bolsheviki were particularly concerned in defending his race. In certain localities of the South the Jews, constantly exposed to assault and pillage by robber bands and occasionally by individual Red soldiers, had appealed to the Soviet Government for permission to organize themselves for self-defence, requesting that arms be given them. But in all such cases the Government refused. It was the general sentiment of the Zionists that the continuation of the Bolsheviki in power meant the destruction of the Jews. The Russian Jews, as a rule, were not workers. From time immemorial they had engaged in trade; but business had been destroyed by the Communists, and before the Jew could be turned into a worker he would deteriorate, as a race, and become extinct. Specific Jewish culture, the most priceless thing to the Zionists, was frowned upon by the Bolsheviki. That phase of the situation seemed to affect them even more deeply than pogroms. These intellectual Jews were not of the proletarian class. They were bourgeois without any revolutionary spirit. Their criticism of the Bolsheviki did not appeal to me for it was a criticism from the Right. If I had still believed in the Communists as the true champions of the Revolution I could have defended them against the Zionist complaints. But I myself had lost faith in the revolutionary integrity of the Bolsheviki.…

Читать это издание →

← Назад к Эмма Гольдман