SigPhiSigPhi

Индивид, общество и государство

Эмма Гольдман

Язык:
английский
Статус:
Полное произведение
Авторство:
Написано автором
Состояние текста:
Чистый текст
Объём:
~5 470 слов · 26 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
  • APAЭмма Гольдман. (n.d.). Индивид, общество и государство. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state
  • MLAЭмма Гольдман. "Индивид, общество и государство." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state.
  • ChicagoЭмма Гольдман. Индивид, общество и государство. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state.

О чём это

Поздний очерк, где Голдман подводит итог своей политической философии: личность как мера, государство как угроза, общество как ткань.

Контекст и история

Тридцатые годы, после того как она увидела и фашизм, и сталинизм, и потому тоньше ранних работ: всё держится на различении общества и государства. Это короткая статья, а не книга: её объём в каталоге не изъян копии. Значительная часть написанного Голдман имеет такой вид — в её журнале «Mother Earth» и в брошюрах.

Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.

Как начинается
The minds of men are in confusion, for the very foundations of our civilization seem to be tottering. People are losing faith in the existing institutions, and the more intelligent realize that capitalist industrialism is defeating the very purpose it is supposed to serve. The world is at a loss for a way out. Parliamentarism and democracy are on the decline. Salvation is being sought in Fascism and other forms of “strong” government. The struggle of opposing ideas now going on in the world involves social problems urgently demanding a solution. The welfare of the individual and the fate of human society depend on the right answer to those questions The crisis, unemployment, war, disarmament, international relations, etc., are among those problems. The State, government with its functions and powers, is now the subject of vital interest to every thinking man. Political developments in all civilized countries have brought the questions home. Shall we have a strong government? Are democracy and parliamentary government to be preferred, or is Fascism of one kind or another, dictatorship - monarchical, bourgeois or proletarian - the solution of the ills and difficulties that beset society today? In other words, shall we cure the evils of democracy by more democracy, or shall we cut the Gordian knot of popular government with the sword of dictatorship? My answer is neither the one nor the other. I am against dictatorship and Fascism as I am opposed to parliamentary regimes and so-called political democracy. Nazism has been justly called an attack on civilization. This characterization applies with equal force to every form of dictatorship; indeed, to every kind of suppression and coercive authority. For what is civilization in the true sense? All progress has been essentially an enlargement of the liberties of the individual with a corresponding decrease of the authority wielded over him by external forces.…

Читать полностью →

← Назад к Эмма Гольдман