SigPhiSigPhi

Новый Органон

Фрэнсис Бэкон

Язык:
английский
Статус:
Полное произведение
Авторство:
Написано автором
Состояние текста:
Чистый текст
Объём:
~96 200 слов · 457 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
  • APAФрэнсис Бэкон. (n.d.). Новый Органон. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/francis-bacon/novum-organum-or-true-suggestions-for-the-interpretation-of-nature
  • MLAФрэнсис Бэкон. "Новый Органон." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/francis-bacon/novum-organum-or-true-suggestions-for-the-interpretation-of-nature.
  • ChicagoФрэнсис Бэкон. Новый Органон. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/francis-bacon/novum-organum-or-true-suggestions-for-the-interpretation-of-nature.

О чём это

Предложение нового метода познания природы: начинать с наблюдения и постепенно восходить к законам, а не выводить всё из унаследованных начал.

Контекст и история

Издан в 1620 году как вторая часть «Великого восстановления наук» — шестичастного замысла, который Бэкон так и не завершил. Заглавие противопоставлено «Органону» Аристотеля, который здесь и есть препятствие, подлежащее преодолению. Самая читаемая часть — четыре «идола»: рода, пещеры, площади и театра, то есть типичные способы, какими человеческий ум обманывает сам себя.

Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.

Как начинается
They who have presumed to dogmatize on nature, as on some well investigated subject, either from self-conceit or arrogance, and in the professorial style, have inflicted the greatest injury on philosophy and learning. For they have tended to stifle and interrupt inquiry exactly in proportion as they have prevailed in bringing others to their opinion: and their own activity has not counterbalanced the mischief they have occasioned by corrupting and destroying that of others. They again who have entered upon a contrary course, and asserted that nothing whatever can be known, whether they have fallen into this opinion from their hatred of the ancient sophists, or from the hesitation of their minds, or from an exuberance of learning, have certainly adduced reasons for it which are by no means contemptible. They have not, however, derived their opinion from true sources, and, hurried on by their zeal and some affectation, have certainly exceeded due moderation. But the more ancient Greeks (whose writings have perished), held a more prudent mean, between the arrogance of dogmatism, and the despair of scepticism; and though too frequently intermingling complaints and indignation at the difficulty of inquiry, and the obscurity of things, and champing, as it were, the bit, have still persisted in pressing their point, and pursuing their intercourse with nature; thinking, as it seems, that the better method was not to dispute upon the very point of the possibility of anything being known, but to put it to the test of experience. Yet they themselves, by only employing the power of the understanding, have not adopted a fixed rule, but have laid their whole stress upon intense meditation, and a continual exercise and perpetual agitation of the mind.…

Читать полностью →

← Назад к Фрэнсис Бэкон