SigPhiSigPhi

Сравнительные жизнеописания

Плутарх

Язык:
английский
Статус:
Полное произведение
Авторство:
Написано автором
Состояние текста:
Шумов сканирования не обнаружено (автоматическая оценка всего текста, вручную не проверялась)
Объём:
~750 000 слов · 3 583 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
  • APAПлутарх. (n.d.). Plutarch Lives of the noble Grecians and Romans [Сравнительные жизнеописания]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/plutarch/plutarch-lives-of-the-noble-grecians-and-romans
  • MLAПлутарх. Plutarch Lives of the noble Grecians and Romans [Сравнительные жизнеописания]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/plutarch/plutarch-lives-of-the-noble-grecians-and-romans.
  • ChicagoПлутарх. Plutarch Lives of the noble Grecians and Romans [Сравнительные жизнеописания]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/plutarch/plutarch-lives-of-the-noble-grecians-and-romans.

Ссылка на воспроизведённое издание. SigPhi — цифровая репродукция. Год, издатель и переводчик указаны, если известны; «n.d.» означает неизвестный год.

О чём это

Двадцать три пары жизнеописаний, греческое и римское в каждой, сопоставленные друг с другом: Александр и Цезарь, Демосфен и Цицерон.

Контекст и история

Плутарх написал их в начале II века и предупреждает, что пишет не историю, а жизни: малый жест или фраза, по его словам, открывают характер лучше, чем битва с тысячами убитых. Через английский перевод Норта они дошли до Шекспира, который почти сцена за сценой извлёк из них «Юлия Цезаря», «Кориолана» и «Антония и Клеопатру».

Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.

Отрывок из доступного издания
those that were to be sent, there arose fresh discontents and accusations against Aegeus among the people, who were full of grief and indignation that he, who was the cause of all their miseries, was the only person exempt from the punishment; adopting and settling his kingdom upon a bastard and foreign son, he took no thought, they said, of their destitution and loss, not of bastards, but lawful children. These things sensibly affected Theseus, who, thinking it but just not to disregard, but rather partake of, the sufferings of his fellow citizens, offered himself for one without any lot. All else were struck with admiration for the nobleness and with love for the goodness of the act; and Aegeus, after prayers and entreaties, finding him inflexible and not to be persuaded, proceeded to the choosing of the rest by lot. Hellanicus, however, tells us that the Athenians did not send the young men and virgins by lot, but that Minos himself used to come and make his own choice, and pitched upon Theseus before all others; according to the conditions agreed upon between them, namely, that the Athenians should furnish them with a ship, and that the young men that were to sail with him should carry no weapon of war; but that if the Minotaur was destroyed, the tribute should cease. On the two former occasions of the payment of the tribute, entertaining no hopes of safety or return, they sent out the ship with a black sail, as to unavoidable destruction; but now, Theseus encouraging his father and speaking greatly of himself, as confident that he should kill the Minotaur, he gave the pilot another sail, which was white, commanding him, as he returned, if Theseus were safe, to make use of that; but if not, to sail with the black one, and to hang out that sign of his misfortune.…

Читать это издание →

← Назад к Плутарх