Мир как воля и представление (I)
- Язык:
- английский
- Статус:
- Полное произведение
- Авторство:
- Написано автором
- Состояние текста:
- Шумов сканирования не обнаружено (автоматическая оценка всего текста, вручную не проверялась)
- Объём:
- ~200 000 слов · 962 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
- APAАртур Шопенгауэр. (n.d.). The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 1 of 3) [Мир как воля и представление (I)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-1-of-3
- MLAАртур Шопенгауэр. The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 1 of 3) [Мир как воля и представление (I)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-1-of-3.
- ChicagoАртур Шопенгауэр. The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 1 of 3) [Мир как воля и представление (I)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-1-of-3.
Ссылка на издание, которое воспроизводит SigPhi: SigPhi — его цифровое воспроизведение, а не издатель. Год издания в метаданных не указан (отсюда «n.d.»), а переводчик указывается, только если он известен.
О чём это
Первый том главного сочинения Шопенгауэра: мир как представление и мир как воля, в четырёх книгах — от познания к искусству и к отрицанию воли.
Контекст и история
Шопенгауэр издал книгу в 1818 году, и двадцать пять лет её почти никто не читал; в 1844-м он выпустил второе издание с дополнительным томом, равным по объёму первому. Настоящий английский перевод разносит целое на три тома. В предисловии он сам предупреждал, что книгу надо прочесть дважды, ибо начало понятно лишь с конца; это требование буквальное, а не оборот речи.
Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.
As I have absolutely nothing to advance against these reproaches, I only hope for some small thanks from such readers for having warned them in time, so that they may not lose an hour over a book which it would be useless to read without complying with the demands that have been made, and which should therefore be left alone, particularly as apart from this we might wager a great deal that it can say nothing to them, but rather that it will always be only _pancorum hominum_, and must therefore quietly and modestly wait for the few whose unusual mode of thought may find it enjoyable. For apart from the difficulties and the effort which it requires from the reader, what cultured man of this age, whose knowledge has almost reached the august point at which the paradoxical and the false are all one to it, could bear to meet thoughts almost on every page that directly contradict that which he has yet himself established once for all as true and undeniable? And then, how disagreeably disappointed will many a one be if he finds no mention here of what he believes it is precisely here he ought to look for, because his method of speculation agrees with that of a great living philosopher,(1) who has certainly written pathetic books, and who only has the trifling weakness that he takes all he learned and approved before his fifteenth year for inborn ideas of the human mind. Who could stand all this? Therefore my advice is simply to lay down the book. But I fear I shall not escape even thus. The reader who has got as far as the preface and been stopped by it, has bought the book for cash, and asks how he is to be indemnified. My last refuge is now to remind him that he knows how to make use of a book in several ways, without exactly reading it. It may fill a gap in his library as well as many another, where, neatly bound, it will certainly look well. Or he can lay it on the toilet-table or the tea-table of some learned lady friend.…