SigPhiSigPhi

Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Sankaracharya, Part I (Brahma Sutra Bhashya)

阿迪·商羯罗

语言:
英语
译者:
George Thibaut
状态:
选辑或部分作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
文本清晰 · 1 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
篇幅:
约 480,000 词 · 2,263 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA阿迪·商羯罗. (n.d.). Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Sankaracharya, Part I (Brahma Sutra Bhashya). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/adi-shankara/vedanta-sutras-with-the-commentary-by-sankaracharya-part-i-brahma-sutra-bhashya
  • MLA阿迪·商羯罗. "Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Sankaracharya, Part I (Brahma Sutra Bhashya)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/adi-shankara/vedanta-sutras-with-the-commentary-by-sankaracharya-part-i-brahma-sutra-bhashya.
  • Chicago阿迪·商羯罗. Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Sankaracharya, Part I (Brahma Sutra Bhashya). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/adi-shankara/vedanta-sutras-with-the-commentary-by-sankaracharya-part-i-brahma-sutra-bhashya.

内容简介

商羯罗为《梵经》所作的注释,不二论吠檀多的奠基文本:梵与我——世界的根基与自我——并非二物。

背景与流传

《梵经》的经句极为简省,无法单独阅读;正因如此,要紧的是注释,也正因如此才有彼此对立的注释:罗摩奴阇与摩陀婆注的是同一部经,却引出与商羯罗迥异的教义。读此书,读到的是三种可能读法中的一种,而非中立的原典;开卷之前知道这一点是有益的。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
Transliteration of Oriental Alphabets adopted for the Trans¬ lations of the Sacred Books of the East . . . . 445 To the sacred literature of the Brahmans, in the strict sense of the term, i. e. to the Veda, there belongs a certain number of complementary works without whose assistance the student is, according to Hindu notions, unable to do more than commit the sacred texts to memory. In the first place all Vedic texts must, in order to be under¬ stood, be read together with running commentaries such as Saya;za 5 s commentaries on the Sa^hitas and Brahma^as, and the Bhashyas ascribed to .Sankara on the chief Upanishads. But these commentaries do not by themselves conduce to a full comprehension of the contents of the sacred texts, since they confine themselves to explaining the meaning of each detached passage without investigating its relation to other passages, and the whole of which they form part; considerations of the latter kind are at any rate introduced occasionally only. The task of taking a com¬ prehensive view of the contents of the Vedic writings as a whole, of systematising what they present in an unsystematical form, of showing the mutual co-ordination or sub¬ ordination of single passages and sections, and of reconciling contradictions—which, according to the view of the orthodox commentators, can be apparent only—is allotted to a sepa¬ rate jastra or body of doctrine which is termed Mima^sa, i. e. the investigation or enquiry kclt iioxyv, viz. the enquiry into the connected meaning of the sacred texts.

阅读全文 →

← 返回阿迪·商羯罗