SigPhiSigPhi

Lettres Provinciales

帕斯卡

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 120,000 词 · 575 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA帕斯卡. (n.d.). Lettres Provinciales. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales
  • MLA帕斯卡. Lettres Provinciales. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales.
  • Chicago帕斯卡. Lettres Provinciales. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

《致外省人书》一六五六至五七年的法文原本:应当引用的正是它;也正是它造就了近代法语散文。

背景与流传

目录中另有一种附历史导论的英译本;而此处是帕斯卡所写的原样,这一点在此尤为要紧,因为在这部书里,语言本身就是论证。这十八封匿名书信之所以取胜,不仅在于它们如何驳斥耶稣会的决疑论,更在于它们说话的方式:用寻常法语,用对话,用反语,用短句——而其时,一场神学论争本该用拉丁文写给内行看。伏尔泰称它是用法语散文写成的第一部天才之书。这些书信奉王命焚毁,一六六〇年被列入禁书目录。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
The question here was, if he could, without presumption, entertain a doubt that these propositions were in Jansenius, after the bishops had declared that they were. The matter having been brought before the Sorbonne, seventy-one doctors undertook his defence, maintaining that the only reply he could possibly give to the demands made upon him in so many publications, calling on him to say if he held that these propositions were in that book, was that he had not been able to find them, but that if they were in the book, he condemned them in the book. Some even went a step farther and protested that, after all the search they had made into the book, they had never stumbled upon these propositions, and that they had, on the contrary, found sentiments entirely at variance with them. They then earnestly begged that, if any doctor present had discovered them, he would have the goodness to point them out; adding that what was so easy could not reasonably be refused, as this would be the surest way to silence the whole of them, M. Arnauld included; but this proposal has been uniformly declined. So much for the one side. On the other side are eighty secular doctors and some forty mendicant friars, who have condemned M. Arnauld's proposition, without choosing to examine whether he has spoken truly or falsely- who, in fact, have declared that they have nothing to do with the veracity of his proposition, but simply with its temerity. Besides these, there were fifteen who were not in favor of the censure, and who are called Neutrals. Such was the issue of the question of fact, regarding which, I must say, I give myself very little concern. It does not affect my conscience in the least whether M.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回帕斯卡