神学论文集，H.F.斯图尔特与E.K.……英译
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估，未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 130,000 词 · 602 个段落
引用本作品
- APA波爱修斯. (n.d.). The theological tractates, with an English translation by H.F. Stewart and E.K. [神学论文集，H.F.斯图尔特与E.K.……英译]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/boethius/the-theological-tractates-with-an-english-translation-by-h-f-stewart-and-e-k
- MLA波爱修斯. The theological tractates, with an English translation by H.F. Stewart and E.K. [神学论文集，H.F.斯图尔特与E.K.……英译]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/boethius/the-theological-tractates-with-an-english-translation-by-h-f-stewart-and-e-k.
- Chicago波爱修斯. The theological tractates, with an English translation by H.F. Stewart and E.K. [神学论文集，H.F.斯图尔特与E.K.……英译]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/boethius/the-theological-tractates-with-an-english-translation-by-h-f-stewart-and-e-k.
这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用：SigPhi 是其数字复制品，不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份（因此写作“n.d.”），译者只有在有记录时才列出。
内容简介
波爱修斯以亚里士多德的逻辑方法处理基督教教义的五篇短论，此为洛布丛书拉丁—英文对照本。
背景与流传
篇幅极短，而分量极重。影响最大的是第三篇《论七日》（De hebdomadibus）：它问，事物何以能仅仅因其“存在”而为善？此中出现了“存在”（esse）与“一物是什么”之间的区分，这对托马斯·阿奎那至关紧要，他还为此文作过注。末一篇《驳欧迪奇与聂斯脱利》含有“位格”的定义——“理性本性的个别实体”——这一定义统摄了此后一千年关于“什么是位格／人格”的神学与哲学争论。波爱修斯写这些短论时尚未失势；《哲学的慰藉》——语料库中亦有——则写于狱中候刑之际，且值得注意的是，其中并未提及基督教。
这是编辑性背景，不是可引用的来源：与作品本身的段落不同，这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
of the Christian religion ; but that form of faith is valid and only valid which, both on account of the universal character of the rules and doctrines affirm ing its authority, and because the worship in which * e.y. Aug. De Triu. 5 propterea, quod eius cultus per omnes paene mundi terminos emanauit, catholica uel uniuersalis uocatur. Cuius haec de trinitatis imitate sententia est: " Pater," inquiunt, "deus filius deus spiritus sanctus deus." Igitur pater filius spiritus sanctus unus non tres dii. 10 Cuius coniunctionis ratio est indifferentia. Eos enini differentia comitatur qui uel augent uel minuunt, ut Arriani qui gradibus meritorum trinitatem uariantes distrahunt atque in pluralitatem diducunt. Principium enim pluralitatis alteritas est ; praeter alteritatem 15 enim nee pluralitas quid sit intellegi potest. Trium namque rerum uel quotlibet turn genere turn specie turn numero diuersitas constat ; quotiens enim idem dicitur, totiens diuersum etiam praedicatur. Idem uero dicitur tribus modis : aut genere ut idem homo '20 quod equus, quia his idem genus ut animal ; uel specie ut idem Cato quod Cicero, quia eadem species ut homo ; uel numero ut Tullius et Cicero, quia unus est numero. Quare diuersum etiam uel genere uel specie uel numero dicitur. Sed numero differentiam 25 accidentium uarietas facit. Nam tres homines neque genere neque specie sed suis accideiitibus distant ; nam uel si ammo cuncta ab his accidentia separemus, tamen locus cunctis diuersus est quern unum fingere nullo modo possumus ; duo enim corpora unum locum 30 non obtinebunt, qui est accidens. Atque ideo sunt numero plures, quoniam accidentibus plures fiunt. " The terras differentia, numerus, species, are used expertly, as would be expected of the author of the In Isag. Porph. Commenta. See S. Brandt's edition of that work (in the Vienna Corpus, 1906), s.v. differentia, etc.…