談談方法
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 23,200 词 · 110 个段落
引用本作品
- APA笛卡尔. (n.d.). 談談方法. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth
- MLA笛卡尔. "談談方法." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth.
- Chicago笛卡尔. 談談方法. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth.
内容简介
笛卡尔如何决意怀疑所学的一切,并从唯一经受住怀疑的确定性——我思故我在——出发重建知识的自述。
背景与流传
1637年匿名出版于莱顿,用的是法语而非学者通用的拉丁语:笛卡尔说,他要让«连妇女和未受教育的人»也能读懂。它本是三篇科学论文(光学、气象学、几何学)的序言,但序言吞没了正文。写于荷兰——四年前伽利略的遭遇犹在眼前,笛卡尔在那里过着谨慎的生活。这是现代哲学的出生证明:以怀疑着的自我为一切的根基。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
If this Discourse appear too long to be read at once, it may be divided into six Parts: and, in the first, will be found various considerations touching the Sciences; in the second, the principal rules of the Method which the Author has discovered, in the third, certain of the rules of Morals which he has deduced from this Method; in the fourth, the reasonings by which he establishes the existence of God and of the Human Soul, which are the foundations of his Metaphysic; in the fifth, the order of the Physical questions which he has investigated, and, in particular, the explication of the motion of the heart and of some other difficulties pertaining to Medicine, as also the difference between the soul of man and that of the brutes; and, in the last, what the Author believes to be required in order to greater advancement in the investigation of Nature than has yet been made, with the reasons that have induced him to write. PART I Good sense is, of all things among men, the most equally distributed; for every one thinks himself so abundantly provided with it, that those even who are the most difficult to satisfy in everything else, do not usually desire a larger measure of this quality than they already possess. And in this it is not likely that all are mistaken the conviction is rather to be held as testifying that the power of judging aright and of distinguishing truth from error, which is properly what is called good sense or reason, is by nature equal in all men; and that the diversity of our opinions, consequently, does not arise from some being endowed with a larger share of reason than others, but solely from this, that we conduct our thoughts along different ways, and do not fix our attention on the same…