爱德华·伯恩施坦
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 74,100 词 · 352 个段落
引用本作品
- APA爱德华·伯恩施坦. (n.d.). Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism and Affirmation [爱德华·伯恩施坦]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/eduard-bernstein/evolutionary-socialism-a-criticism-and-affirmation
- MLA爱德华·伯恩施坦. Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism and Affirmation [爱德华·伯恩施坦]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/eduard-bernstein/evolutionary-socialism-a-criticism-and-affirmation.
- Chicago爱德华·伯恩施坦. Evolutionary Socialism: A Criticism and Affirmation [爱德华·伯恩施坦]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/eduard-bernstein/evolutionary-socialism-a-criticism-and-affirmation.
本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。
内容简介
《社会主义的前提》(1899):把马克思主义一分为二的那本书。
背景与流传
伯恩施坦曾是恩格斯的遗嘱执行人,而他在这里说:马克思的预言没有应验;资本主义没有崩溃,中间阶层在扩大,工人过得更好了。结论是:改良,不要等革命。欧洲的每一个社会民主党都由此而来。英译本;德文本不在目录中。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
the relations of property within which they have hitherto moved. From forms of development of the forces of production, these relations change into fetters. Then enters an epoch of social revolution. With the change of the economic foundation the whole gigantic superstructure (the legal and political organisations to which certain social forms of consciousness correspond) is more slowly or more quickly overthrown. One form of society never perishes before all the productive forces are evolved for which it is sufficiently comprehensive, and new or higher conditions of production never step on to the scene before the material conditions of existence of the same have come to light out of the womb of the old society. The bourgeois relations of production are the last antagonistic form of the social process of production . . . but the productive forces developing in the heart of the bourgeois society create at the same time the material conditions for the solution of this antagonism. The previous history of human society, therefore, terminates with this form of society.* It must first be observed by anticipation that the concluding sentence and the word " last M in the preceding sentence are not capable of proof but are hypotheses more or less well founded. But they are not essential to the theory and even belong much more to the * A Contribution to the Criticism of Political Economy. Preface. applications of it, and they may therefore be passed over here. If we look at the other sentences we are struck, above all, by their dogmatic wording, except the phrase the " more slowly or more quickly M (which indeed hides a good deal).…