SigPhiSigPhi

个人、社会与国家

艾玛·戈尔德曼

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 5,470 词 · 26 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA艾玛·戈尔德曼. (n.d.). The Individual, Society and the State [个人、社会与国家]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state
  • MLA艾玛·戈尔德曼. The Individual, Society and the State [个人、社会与国家]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state.
  • Chicago艾玛·戈尔德曼. The Individual, Society and the State [个人、社会与国家]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

晚年的一篇文章,戈德曼在其中总结自己的政治哲学:个人是尺度,国家是威胁,社会是织体。

背景与流传

写于三十年代,那时她已经见过法西斯主义也见过斯大林主义,因此比早年的作品更有分寸:全部分量都压在社会与国家之分上。 这是一篇短文,不是一本书:它在目录中篇幅短小并非副本有缺。戈德曼的大部分文字都是这个样子,登在她的杂志《大地母亲》上,或者印成小册子。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
Peter Kropotkin has shown what wonderful results this unique force of man’s individuality has achieved when strengthened by co-operation with other individualities. The one-sided and entirely inadequate Darwinian theory of the struggle for existence received its biological and sociological completion from the great Anarchist scientist and thinker. In his profound work, Mutual Aid Kropotkin shows that in the animal kingdom, as well as in human society, co-operation - as opposed to internecine strife and struggle - has worked for the survival and evolution of the species. He demonstrated that only mutual aid and voluntary co-operation - not the omnipotent, all-devastating State - can create the basis for a free individual and associational life. At present the individual is the pawn of the zealots of dictatorship and the equally obsessed zealots of “rugged individualism.” The excuse of the former is its claim of a new objective. The latter does not even make a pretense of anything new. As a matter of fact “rugged individualism” has learned nothing and forgotten nothing. Under its guidance the brute struggle for physical existence is still kept up. Strange as it may seem, and utterly absurd as it is, the struggle for physical survival goes merrily on though the necessity for it has entirely disappeared. Indeed, the struggle is being continued apparently because there is no necessity for it. Does not so-called overproduction prove it? Is not the world-wide economic crisis an eloquent demonstration that the struggle for existence is being maintained by the blindness of “rugged individualism” at the risk of its own destruction? One of the insane characteristics of this struggle is the complete negation of the relation of the producer to the things he produces. The average worker has no inner point of contact with the industry he is employed in, and he is a stranger to the process of production of which he is a mechanical part.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回艾玛·戈尔德曼