SigPhiSigPhi

革命与反革命:1848年的德国

弗里德里希·恩格斯

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 46,900 词 · 223 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA弗里德里希·恩格斯. (n.d.). Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848 [革命与反革命:1848年的德国]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/friedrich-engels/revolution-and-counter-revolution-or-germany-in-1848
  • MLA弗里德里希·恩格斯. Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848 [革命与反革命:1848年的德国]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/friedrich-engels/revolution-and-counter-revolution-or-germany-in-1848.
  • Chicago弗里德里希·恩格斯. Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848 [革命与反革命:1848年的德国]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/friedrich-engels/revolution-and-counter-revolution-or-germany-in-1848.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

《德国的革命和反革命》(1851-52)。

背景与流传

它们以马克思的名义登在《纽约论坛报》上,因为马克思没时间写;写的是恩格斯。这是即时的历史:分析1848年德国革命为什么失败,而执笔的人自己扛过枪在其中打过仗。 英译本。恩格斯的德文原本不在目录中。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
peasantry and farm laborers, for obvious reasons found in an alliance with the anti-feudal middle class of the towns its most natural political course. Then there were, secondly, the small freeholders, predominating in the Rhine country, where feudalism had succumbed before the mighty strokes of the great French Revolution. Similar independent small freeholders also existed here and there in other provinces, where they had succeeded in buying off the feudal charges formerly due upon their lands. This class, however, was a class of freeholders by name only, their property being generally mortgaged to such an extent, and under such onerous conditions, that not the peasant, but the usurer who had advanced the money, was the real landowner. Thirdly, the feudal tenants, who could not be easily turned out of their holdings, but who had to pay a perpetual rent, or to perform in perpetuity a certain amount of labor in favor of the lord of the manor. Lastly, the agricultural laborers, whose condition, in many large farming concerns, was exactly that of the same class in England, and who in all cases lived and died poor, ill-fed, and the slaves of their employers. These three latter classes of the agricultural population, the small freeholders, the feudal tenants, and the agricultural laborers, never troubled their heads much about politics before the Revolution, but it is evident that this event must have opened to them a new career, full of brilliant prospects. To every one of them the Revolution offered advantages, and the movement once fairly engaged in, it was to be expected that each, in their turn, would join it.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回弗里德里希·恩格斯