教育漫话
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 120,000 词 · 561 个段落
引用本作品
- APA约翰·洛克. (n.d.). 教育漫话. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-locke/some-thoughts-concerning-education-1902
- MLA约翰·洛克. "教育漫话." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-locke/some-thoughts-concerning-education-1902.
- Chicago约翰·洛克. 教育漫话. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-locke/some-thoughts-concerning-education-1902.
内容简介
洛克论如何教养孩子的书,起于他就一位友人的儿子所写的几封信,一六九三年出版。
背景与流传
正是此书使“儿童的心灵如同一页白纸”这一形象流通开来;而它由此引出的是一个实践的结论:一个人长大后成为什么样,几乎全系于习惯,因此教育当先塑造品性,而后才谈得上装满头脑。由此而有他那些具体的建议——它们既招来非议,也终于获胜:除非顽劣不改,不施体罚;不以糖果为奖赏;多运动、多接触户外空气;睡硬床;而最要紧的,是像对一个人那样同孩子讲道理,因为他本来就是一个人。此书在一个世纪内是欧洲影响最大的教育手册;卢梭写《爱弥儿》,正是与它争辩。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
Kw, being written several Years since for Your Sake^ and are no other than what You have already by You in my Letters, I have so little var^d any Things but only the I Order of what was sent you at different Times^ and on several , Occasions^ that the Reader will easily find^ in the Familiarity and Fashion of the StiUy that they were rather the private Conversation of two Friends, than a Discourse designed for publick View, The Importunity of Friends is the common Apology for Publications Men are afraid to own themselves forward to. But you know I can truly say, that if some^ who having heard of these Papers of mine, had not presid to ^ee them, and afterwards to have them printed, they had lain dormant still in that Privacy they were designed for. But those, whose Judgment I defer much tOj telling me, that they were per' Ixii • The Epistle Dedicatory. Ixii • The Epistle Dedicatory. suaded^ that this rough Draught of mine might he of some Use^ if made more fublick^ touched upon what will always be very prevalent with me : For I think it every Man^s indispensible Duty, to do all the Service he can to his Country; and I see not what Difference he puts between himself and his Caftlcy who lives without that Thought This Subject is of so great Concernment, and a right Way of Education is of so general Advantage, that did I find my Abilities answer my Wishes, I should not have needed Exhortations or Importunitiesfrom others. However, the Meanness of these Papers, and my fust Distrust of them, shall not keep me, by the Shame of doing so little, from contributing my Mite, when there is no more required of me than my throwing it into the publick Receptacle, And if there be any more of their Size and Notions, who liHd them so well, that they thought them worth printing, 1 may flatter myself they will not be lost Labour…