政治经济学批判
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰 · 1 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
- 篇幅:
- 约 89,700 词 · 426 个段落
引用本作品
- APA卡尔·马克思. (n.d.). 政治经济学批判. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy
- MLA卡尔·马克思. "政治经济学批判." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy.
- Chicago卡尔·马克思. 政治经济学批判. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/karl-marx/a-contribution-to-the-critique-of-political-economy.
内容简介
《政治经济学批判》(1859),《资本论》之前的那本书。
背景与流传
它的序言是《宣言》之外整个马克思被引用最多的文字:其中有历史唯物主义的标准表述——「不是人们的意识决定他们的存在,相反」——以及基础与上层建筑的图式。六页纸,安排了一个世纪的争论。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
_Capital_, _landed property_, _wage labor_; _state_, _foreign trade_, _world market_. Under the first three heads I examine the conditions of the economic existence of the three great classes, which make up modern bourgeois society; the connection of the three remaining heads is self evident. The first part of the first book, treating of capital, consists of the following chapters: 1. Commodity; 2. Money, or simple circulation; 3. Capital in general. The first two chapters form the contents of the present work. The entire material lies before me in the form of monographs, written at long intervals not for publication, but for the purpose of clearing up those questions to myself, and their systematic elaboration on the plan outlined above will depend upon circumstances. I omit a general introduction which I had prepared, as on second thought any anticipation of results that are still to be proven, seemed to me objectionable, and the reader who wishes to follow me at all, must make up his mind to pass from the special to the general. On the other hand, some remarks as to the course of my own politico-economic studies may be in place here. The subject of my professional studies was jurisprudence, which I pursued, however, in connection with and as secondary to the studies of philosophy and history. In 1842-43, as editor of the “Rheinische Zeitung,” I found myself embarrassed at first when I had to take part in discussions concerning so-called material interests. The proceedings of the Rhine Diet in connection with forest thefts and the extreme subdivision of landed property; the official controversy about the condition of the Mosel peasants into which Herr von Schaper, at that time president of the Rhine Province, entered with the “Rheinische Zeitung;” finally, the debates on free trade and protection, gave me the first impulse to take up the study of…