资本论 (I)
- 语言:
- 英语
- 译者:
- Samuel Moore i Edward Aveling
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
- 篇幅:
- 约 190,000 词 · 921 个段落
引用本作品
- APA卡尔·马克思. (n.d.). Capital, Vol. I: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production [资本论 (I)] (Samuel Moore i Edward Aveling, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/karl-marx/capital-vol-i-a-critical-analysis-of-capitalist-production
- MLA卡尔·马克思. Capital, Vol. I: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production [资本论 (I)]. Translated by Samuel Moore i Edward Aveling. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/karl-marx/capital-vol-i-a-critical-analysis-of-capitalist-production.
- Chicago卡尔·马克思. Capital, Vol. I: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production [资本论 (I)]. Translated by Samuel Moore i Edward Aveling. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/karl-marx/capital-vol-i-a-critical-analysis-of-capitalist-production.
这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。
内容简介
《资本论》第一卷:商品与价值、工作日、剩余价值、机器,以及论所谓原始积累的那一章。
背景与流传
这是三卷中唯一由马克思自己出版的一卷,时在一八六七年;另外两卷是恩格斯据手稿整理的。有一个版本细节很要紧:一八七二至七五年的法译本经马克思亲自校订并作了改动,他写道那个版本具有“独立于原本的科学价值”。论工作日与工厂的那几章塞满了英国工厂视察员报告的引文,单独读来,本身就已是一份十九世纪的史料。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
Under these circumstances its professors fell into two groups. The one set, prudent, practical business folk, flocked to the banner of Bastiat, the most superficial and therefore the most adequate representative of the apologetic of vulgar economy ; the other, proud of the professorial dignity of their science, followed John Stuart Mill in his attempt to reconcile irreconcilables. Just as in the classical time of bourgeois economy, so Author's Prefaces. xxv also in the time of its decline, the Germans remained mere schoolboys, imitators and followers, petty retailers and hawkers in the service of the great foreign wholesale concern. The peculiar historic development of German society therefore forbids, in that country, all original work in bourgeois economy ; but not the criticism of that economy. So far as such criticism represents a class, it can only represent the class whose vocation in history is the overthrow of the capitalist mode of production and the final abolition of all classes — the proletariat. The learned and unlearned spokesmen of the German bourgeoisie tried at first to kill "Das Kapital " by silence, as they had managed to do with my earlier writings. As soon as they found that these tactics no longer fited in with the conditions of the time, they wrote, under pretence of criticising my book, prescriptions '' for the tranquillisation of the bourgeois mind." But they found in the workers' press — see, e.g,^ Joseph Dietzgen's articles in the " Volksstaat " — antagonists stronger than themselves, Ko whom (down to this very day) they owe a reply. ^ An excellent Eussian translation of " Das Kapital " ap-