SigPhiSigPhi

无产阶级革命和叛徒考茨基

弗拉基米尔·列宁

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
文本清晰
篇幅:
约 43,200 词 · 205 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA弗拉基米尔·列宁. (n.d.). 无产阶级革命和叛徒考茨基. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/vladimir-lenin/the-proletarian-revolution-and-the-renegade-kautsky
  • MLA弗拉基米尔·列宁. "无产阶级革命和叛徒考茨基." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/vladimir-lenin/the-proletarian-revolution-and-the-renegade-kautsky.
  • Chicago弗拉基米尔·列宁. 无产阶级革命和叛徒考茨基. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/vladimir-lenin/the-proletarian-revolution-and-the-renegade-kautsky.

内容简介

列宁对考茨基的回答;考茨基指责布尔什维克摧毁了民主。

背景与流传

正是在这个文本里,列宁明确地把无产阶级专政辩护为「不受任何法律限制」的权力。最好把它和罗莎·卢森堡的《论俄国革命》放在一起读,那本书目录中也有,它是从布尔什维主义内部提出考茨基那种批评的。 原文为俄文。这里是英译本;引用应以原文为准。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
Kautsky’s pamphlet, The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, recently published in Vienna (Wien, 1918, Ignaz Brand, pp. 63) is a most lucid example of that utter and ignominious bankruptcy of the Second International about which all honest socialists in all countries have been talking for a long time. The proletarian revolution is now becoming a practical issue in a number of countries, and an examination of Kautsky’s renegade sophistries and his complete renunciation of Marxism is therefore essential. First of all, it should be emphasised, however, that the present author has, from the very beginning of the war, repeatedly pointed to Kautsky’s rupture with Marxism. A number of articles published between 1914 and 1916 in Sotsial-Demokrat and Kommunist, issued abroad, dealt with this subject. These articles were afterwards collected and published by the Petrograd Soviet under the title Against the Stream, by G. Zinoviev and N. Lenin (Petrograd, 1918, pp. 550). In a pamphlet published in Geneva in 1915 and translated at the same time into German and French I wrote about “Kautskyism” as follows: “Kautsky, the leading authority in the Second International, is a most typical and striking example of how a verbal recognition of Marxism has led in practice to its conversion into ‘Struvism’, or into ‘Brentanoism’ [i.e., into a bourgeois-liberal theory recognising the non-revolutionary “class” struggle of the proletariat, which was expressed most clearly by Struve, the Russian writer, and Brentano, the German economist]. Another example is Plekhanov. By means of patent sophistry, Marxism is stripped of its revolutionary living spirit; everything is recognised in Marxism except the revolutionary methods of struggle, the propaganda and preparation of those methods, and the education of the masses in this direction.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回弗拉基米尔·列宁