SigPhiSigPhi

马克思主义的三个来源和三个组成部分

弗拉基米尔·列宁

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 2,320 词 · 11 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA弗拉基米尔·列宁. (n.d.). The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [马克思主义的三个来源和三个组成部分]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism
  • MLA弗拉基米尔·列宁. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [马克思主义的三个来源和三个组成部分]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.
  • Chicago弗拉基米尔·列宁. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [马克思主义的三个来源和三个组成部分]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

1913年的一篇文章:马克思主义来自德国哲学、英国经济学和法国社会主义。

背景与流传

三页纸,定下了此后七十年马克思主义的讲法。短是这篇文章本来就短:它是一篇普及性的文字,不是一本书。 原文为俄文。这里是英译本;引用应以原文为准。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
Where the bourgeois economists saw a relation between things (the exchange of one commodity for another) Marx revealed a relation between people. The exchange of commodities expresses the connection between individual producers through the market. Money signifies that the connection is becoming closer and closer, inseparably uniting the entire economic life of the individual producers into one whole. Capital signifies a further development of this connection: man’s labour-power becomes a commodity. The wage-worker sells his labour-power to the owner of land, factories and instruments of labour. The worker spends one part of the day covering the cost of maintaining himself and his family (wages), while the other part of the day he works without remuneration, creating for the capitalist surplus-value, the source of profit, the source of the wealth of the capitalist class. The doctrine of surplus-value is the corner-stone of Marx’s economic theory. Capital, created by the labour of the worker, crushes the worker, ruining small proprietors and creating an army of unemployed. In industry, the victory of large-scale production is immediately apparent, but the same phenomenon is also to be observed in agriculture, where the superiority of large-scale capitalist agriculture is enhanced, the use of machinery increases and the peasant economy, trapped by money-capital, declines and falls into ruin under the burden of its backward technique. The decline of small-scale production assumes different forms in agriculture, but the decline itself is an indisputable fact. By destroying small-scale production, capital leads to an increase in productivity of labour and to the creation of a monopoly position for the associations of big capitalists. Production itself becomes more and more social—hundreds of thousands and millions of workers become bound together in a regular economic organism—but the product of this collective labour is appropriated by a handful of capitalists.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回弗拉基米尔·列宁