SigPhiSigPhi

The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature

威廉·詹姆斯

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 200,000 词 · 952 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA威廉·詹姆斯. (n.d.). The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature
  • MLA威廉·詹姆斯. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.
  • Chicago威廉·詹姆斯. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.

本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。

内容简介

詹姆斯一九〇一至一九〇二年的吉福德讲座:以第一手证词为材料,研究皈依、圣德、神秘经验与“病态的灵魂”。

背景与流传

成就此书的正是它的取材准则。詹姆斯决定只看个人的经验——一个人独处时所发生的事——而把制度、教义与教会搁在一旁;他自己也承认,这样的取舍排除了许多东西。他还宁取极端个案而不取寻常个案,理由是极端处现象看得更清楚。这些他都明说了;正因如此,读者可以在明确知道“什么被收入、什么被排除”的前提下与此书争辩。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

所收版本的节选
religious feelings and religious impulses must be its subject, and I must confine myself to those more developed subjective phenomena recorded in literature produced by articulate and fully self‐conscious men, in works of piety and autobiography. Interesting as the origins and early stages of a subject always are, yet when one seeks earnestly for its full significance, one must always look to its more completely evolved and perfect forms. It follows from this that the documents that will most concern us will be those of the men who were most accomplished in the religious life and best able to give an intelligible account of their ideas and motives. These men, of course, are either comparatively modern writers, or else such earlier ones as have become religious classics. The _documents humains_ which we shall find most instructive need not then be sought for in the haunts of special erudition—they lie along the beaten highway; and this circumstance, which flows so naturally from the character of our problem, suits admirably also your lecturer’s lack of special theological learning. I may take my citations, my sentences and paragraphs of personal confession, from books that most of you at some time will have had already in your hands, and yet this will be no detriment to the value of my conclusions. It is true that some more adventurous reader and investigator, lecturing here in future, may unearth from the shelves of libraries documents that will make a more delectable and curious entertainment to listen to than mine. Yet I doubt whether he will necessarily, by his control of so much more out‐of‐the‐way material, get much closer to the essence of the matter in hand. The question, What are the religious propensities? and the question, What is their philosophic significance?…

阅读此版本 →

← 返回威廉·詹姆斯