SigPhiSigPhi

الأخلاق — الجزء 4

باروخ سبينوزا

اللغة:
الإنجليزية
الحالة:
عمل كامل
التأليف:
كتبه المؤلف بنفسه
حالة النص:
نص سليم
الحجم:
~22,500 كلمة · 107 مقطعًا
استشهد بهذا العمل
  • APAباروخ سبينوزا. (n.d.). الأخلاق — الجزء 4. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/baruch-spinoza/ethics-part-4
  • MLAباروخ سبينوزا. "الأخلاق — الجزء 4." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/baruch-spinoza/ethics-part-4.
  • Chicagoباروخ سبينوزا. الأخلاق — الجزء 4. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/baruch-spinoza/ethics-part-4.

عمّ يتحدث

نسق كامل — الله، والعقل، والانفعالات، والحرية — مُبرهَن عليه كأنه هندسة: تعريفات وبديهيات وقضايا تتوّج بفكرة أن الحرية هي فهم الضرورة.

السياق والتاريخ

أتمّ سبينوزا 'الأخلاق' نحو عام 1675 وعدل عن نشره في حياته: ففضيحة قوله 'الله أو الطبيعة' — الله والطبيعة شيء واحد — كانت ستدفنه. صدر عام 1677، بعد وفاته بأشهر، ضمن الأعمال المنشورة بعد الموت، وحُظر على الفور تقريبًا. كان مؤلفه يعيش في لاهاي من صقل العدسات، وقد حُرم من جماعة أمستردام اليهودية في الثالثة والعشرين بحِرمٍ لم يُرفع قط لقسوته. ظل لقب «سبينوزي» شتيمةً قرنًا كاملًا؛ ثم صار، للمثالية الألمانية ولكثيرين غيرها, الجبلَ الذي يجب على كل فلسفة أن تقيس نفسها به.

سياق تحريري، لا مصدر قابل للاقتباس: بخلاف مقاطع العمل نفسه، لا يمكن التحقق من هذه المعلومات في المدونة.

كيف يبدأ
PART IV: Of Human Bondage, or the Strength of the Emotions PREFACE Human infirmity in moderating and checking the emotions I name bondage: for, when a man is a prey to his emotions, he is not his own master, but lies at the mercy of fortune: so much so, that he is often compelled, while seeing that which is better for him, to follow that which is worse. Why this is so, and what is good or evil in the emotions, I propose to show in this part of my treatise. But, before I begin, it would be well to make a few prefatory observations on perfection and imperfection, good and evil. When a man has purposed to make a given thing, and has brought it to perfection, his work will be pronounced perfect, not only by himself, but by everyone who rightly knows, or thinks that he knows, the intention and aim of its author. For instance, suppose anyone sees a work (which I assume to be not yet completed), and knows that the aim of the author of that work is to build a house, he will call the work imperfect; he will, on the other hand, call it perfect, as soon as he sees that it is carried through to the end, which its author had purposed for it. But if a man sees a work, the like whereof he has never seen before, and if he knows not the intention of the artificer, he plainly cannot know, whether that work be perfect or imperfect. Such seems to be the primary meaning of these terms. But, after men began to form general ideas, to think out types of houses, buildings, towers, &c., and to prefer certain types to others, it came about, that each man called perfect that which he saw agree with the general idea he had formed of the thing in question, and called imperfect that which he saw agree less with his own preconceived type, even though it had evidently been completed in accordance with the idea of its artificer.…

اقرأ العمل كاملًا ←

موضوعات العمل

→ العودة إلى باروخ سبينوزا