Creative Evolution
- Sprache:
- Englisch
- Status:
- Vollständiges Werk
- Autorschaft:
- Vom Autor verfasst
- Zustand des Textes:
- Mit Scanfehlern (automatische Messung über den ganzen Text, nicht von Hand geprüft) · 10 unlesbare Passagen, von den Antworten ausgeschlossen
- Umfang:
- ~180.000 Wörter · 844 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
- APAHenri Bergson. (n.d.). Creative Evolution. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution
- MLAHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
- ChicagoHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
Angabe der Ausgabe, die SigPhi wiedergibt: SigPhi ist ihre digitale Reproduktion, nicht der Verlag. Das Erscheinungsjahr steht nicht in den Metadaten (daher „n.d.“), und der Übersetzer erscheint nur, wenn er verzeichnet ist.
Wovon es handelt
Bergsons Vorschlag, die Evolution erkläre sich weder aus dem Zufall noch aus einem vorgefassten Plan, sondern aus einem Antrieb — dem élan vital —, der Wege erprobt und sich in auseinanderstrebende Richtungen teilt.
Kontext und Geschichte
1907 erschienen, hatte das Buch außerhalb der Philosophie ungeheuren Erfolg und machte ihn berühmt; 1927 erhielt er den Nobelpreis für Literatur. Am besten gehalten hat sich nicht der élan vital, den die Biologie nie annahm, sondern die Kritik daran, wie der Verstand die Zeit herstellt: Bergson behauptet, das für das Handeln gemachte Denken verwandle die Dauer in eine Folge unbeweglicher Augenblicke und könne deshalb das Sichverändernde nicht denken.
Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.
From this survival of the past it follows that consciousness cannot go through the same state twice. The circumstances may still be the same, but they will act no longer on the same person, since they find him at a new moment of his history. Our personality, which is being built up each instant with its accumulated experience, changes without ceasing. By changing, it prevents any state, although superficially identical with another, from ever repeating it in its very depth. That is why our duration is irreversible. We could not live over again a single moment, for we should have to begin by effacing the memory of all that had followed. Even could we erase this memory from our intellect, we could not from our will. Thus our personality shoots, grows and ripens without ceasing. Each of its moments is something new added to what was before. We may go further: it is not only something new, but something unforeseeable. Doubtless, my present state is explained by what was in me and by what was acting on me a moment ago. In analyzing it I should find no other elements. But even a superhuman intelligence would not have been able to foresee the simple indivisible form which gives to these purely abstract elements their concrete organization. For to foresee consists of projecting into the future what has been perceived in the past, or of imagining for a later time a new grouping, in a new order, of elements already perceived. But that which has never been perceived, and which is at the same time simple, is necessarily unforeseeable. Now such is the case with each of our states, regarded as a moment in a history that is gradually unfolding: it is simple, and it cannot have been already perceived, since it concentrates in its indivisibility all that has been perceived and what the present is adding to it besides. It is an original moment of a no less original history.