SigPhiSigPhi

Deutsche Philosophie und Politik

John Dewey

Sprache:
Englisch
Status:
Vollständiges Werk
Autorschaft:
Vom Autor verfasst
Zustand des Textes:
Sauberer Text
Umfang:
~27.400 Wörter · 130 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
  • APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). Deutsche Philosophie und Politik. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-dewey/german-philosophy-and-politics
  • MLAJohn Dewey. "Deutsche Philosophie und Politik." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-dewey/german-philosophy-and-politics.
  • ChicagoJohn Dewey. Deutsche Philosophie und Politik. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-dewey/german-philosophy-and-politics.

Wovon es handelt

German Philosophy and Politics (1915): Vorträge darüber, ob Kant und Hegel etwas mit dem Krieg zu tun haben.

Kontext und Geschichte

Mitten im Ersten Weltkrieg geschrieben, und man sollte es in diesem Wissen lesen: ein Philosoph aus einem Land, das in den Krieg eintritt, erklärt das Denken des Feindes. Er ist 1942 mit einem neuen Vorwort darauf zurückgekommen. Es zählt als Dokument darüber, wie man Philosophie im Krieg benutzt, und als Warnung.

Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.

Wie es beginnt
The will of John Calvin McNair established a Foundation at the University of North Carolina upon which public lectures are to be given from time to time to the members of the University. This book contains three lectures which were given in February of this year upon this Foundation. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the many courtesies enjoyed during my brief stay at Chapel Hill, the seat of the University. J. D. Columbia University, New York City, April, 1915. GERMAN PHILOSOPHY AND POLITICS I GERMAN PHILOSOPHY: THE TWO WORLDS The nature of the influence of general ideas upon practical affairs is a troubled question. Mind dislikes to find itself a pilgrim in an alien world. A discovery that the belief in the influence of thought upon action is an illusion would leave men profoundly saddened with themselves and with the world. Were it not that the doctrine forbids any discovery influencing affairs--since the discovery would be an idea--we should say that the discovery of the wholly _ex post facto_ and idle character of ideas would profoundly influence subsequent affairs. The strange thing is that when men had least control over nature and their own affairs, they were most sure of the efficacy of thought. The doctrine that nature does nothing in vain, that it is directed by purpose, was not engrafted by scholasticism upon science; it formulates an instinctive tendency. And if the doctrine be fallacious, its pathos has a noble quality. It testifies to the longing of human thought for a world of its own texture. Yet just in the degree in which men, by means of inventions and political arrangements, have found ways of making their thoughts effective, they have come to question whether any thinking is efficacious. Our notions in physical science tend to reduce mind to a bare spectator of a machine-like nature grinding its unrelenting way.…

Das ganze Werk lesen →

← Zurück zu John Dewey