Die Öffentlichkeit und ihre Probleme
- Sprache:
- Englisch
- Status:
- Vollständiges Werk
- Autorschaft:
- Vom Autor verfasst
- Zustand des Textes:
- Kein Scanrauschen festgestellt (automatische Messung über den ganzen Text, nicht von Hand geprüft)
- Umfang:
- ~60.000 Wörter · 285 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
- APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). The public and its problems [Die Öffentlichkeit und ihre Probleme]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-dewey/the-public-and-its-problems
- MLAJohn Dewey. The public and its problems [Die Öffentlichkeit und ihre Probleme]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-dewey/the-public-and-its-problems.
- ChicagoJohn Dewey. The public and its problems [Die Öffentlichkeit und ihre Probleme]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-dewey/the-public-and-its-problems.
Angabe der Ausgabe, die SigPhi wiedergibt: SigPhi ist ihre digitale Reproduktion, nicht der Verlag. Das Erscheinungsjahr steht nicht in den Metadaten (daher „n.d.“), und der Übersetzer erscheint nur, wenn er verzeichnet ist.
Wovon es handelt
Die Öffentlichkeit und ihre Probleme (1927): Deweys Antwort an die, die sagten, Demokratie sei unmöglich, weil die Bürger zu wenig wissen.
Kontext und Geschichte
Seine Auseinandersetzung mit Walter Lippmann und das wichtigste Werk politischer Theorie, das er geschrieben hat. Seine Antwort — dass die Öffentlichkeit nicht von Natur besteht, sondern hergestellt werden muss, und dass genau das die Kommunikation tut — wird heute mehr besprochen denn je.
Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.
on one hand and uncontrolled speculation on the other. The choice is between blind, unreasoned attack and defense on the one hand, and discriminating criticism employing intelligent method and a conscious criterion on the other. The prestige of the mathematical and physical sciences is great, and properly so. But the difference between facts which are what they are independent of human desire and endeavor and facts which are to some extent what they are because of human interest and purpose, and which alter with alteration in the latter, cannot be got rid of by any methodology. The more sincerely we appeal to facts, the greater is the importance of the distinction between facts which condition human activity and facts which are conditioned by human activity. In the degree which we ignore this difference, social science becomes pseudo-science. Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian political ideas are not merely theories dwelling in the human mind remote from facts of American political behavior. They are expressions of chosen phases and factors among those facts, but they are also something more: namely, forces which have shaped those facts and which are still contending to shape them in the future this way and that. There is more than a speculative difference between a theory of the state which regards it as an instrument in protecting individuals in the rights they already have, and one which conceives its function to be the effecting of a more equitable distribution of rights among individuals. For the theories are held and applied by legislators in congress and by judges on the bench and make a difference in the subsequent facts themselves. I make no doubt that the practical influence of the political philosophies of Aristotle, the Stoics, St. Thomas, Locke, Rousseau, Kant and Hegel has often been exaggerated in comparison with the influence of circumstances.…