SigPhiSigPhi

Der Sozialismus

John Stuart Mill

Sprache:
Englisch
Status:
Vollständiges Werk
Autorschaft:
Vom Autor verfasst
Zustand des Textes:
Kein Scanrauschen festgestellt (automatische Messung über den ganzen Text, nicht von Hand geprüft)
Umfang:
~27.800 Wörter · 132 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
  • APAJohn Stuart Mill. (n.d.). Socialism [Der Sozialismus]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism
  • MLAJohn Stuart Mill. Socialism [Der Sozialismus]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism.
  • ChicagoJohn Stuart Mill. Socialism [Der Sozialismus]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism.

Nachweis der wiedergegebenen Ausgabe. SigPhi ist die digitale Reproduktion. Jahr, Verlag und Übersetzer werden angegeben, soweit bekannt; „n.d.“ bedeutet unbekanntes Jahr.

Wovon es handelt

Nachgelassene Kapitel über den Sozialismus: was an der sozialistischen Kritik richtig ist und was nicht funktionieren würde.

Kontext und Geschichte

Der Mill, den beide Lager lieber vergessen. Er nimmt einen guten Teil der sozialistischen Diagnose über Eigentum und Arbeit an und widerspricht im Namen von Freiheit und Anreizen. Unvollendet: er ist beim Schreiben gestorben.

Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.

Auszug aus der verfügbaren Ausgabe
But it was also said that slavery, that despotism, that all the privileges of oligarchy were necessary. All the successive steps that have been made by the poorer classes, partly won from the better feelings of the powerful, partly extorted from their fears, and partly bought with money, or attained in exchange for support given to one section of the powerful in its quarrels with another, had the strongest prejudices opposed to them beforehand; but their acquisition was a sign of power gained by the subordinate classes, a means to those classes of acquiring more; it consequently drew to those classes a certain share of the respect accorded to power, and produced a corresponding modification in the creed of society respecting them; whatever advantages they succeeded in acquiring came to be considered their due, while, of those which they had not yet attained, they continued to be deemed unworthy. The classes, therefore, which the system of society makes subordinate, have little reason to put faith in any of the maxims which the same system of society may have established as principles. Considering that the opinions of mankind have been found so wonderfully flexible, have always tended to consecrate existing facts, and to declare what did not yet exist, either pernicious or impracticable, what assurance have those classes that the distinction of rich and poor is grounded on a more imperative necessity than those other ancient and long-established facts, which, having been abolished, are now condemned even by those who formerly profited by them? This cannot be taken on the word of an interested party.…

Diese Ausgabe lesen →

← Zurück zu John Stuart Mill