Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience)
- Sprache:
- Englisch
- Status:
- Vollständiges Werk
- Autorschaft:
- Vom Autor verfasst
- Zustand des Textes:
- Kein Scanrauschen festgestellt (automatische Messung über den ganzen Text, nicht von Hand geprüft)
- Umfang:
- ~10.700 Wörter · 51 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
- APAHenry David Thoreau. (n.d.). Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/thoreau/resistance-to-civil-government-civil-disobedience
- MLAHenry David Thoreau. Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/thoreau/resistance-to-civil-government-civil-disobedience.
- ChicagoHenry David Thoreau. Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/thoreau/resistance-to-civil-government-civil-disobedience.
Nachweis der wiedergegebenen Ausgabe. SigPhi ist die digitale Reproduktion. Jahr, Verlag und Übersetzer werden angegeben, soweit bekannt; „n.d.“ bedeutet unbekanntes Jahr.
Wovon es handelt
Widerstand gegen die Regierung (1849), unter dem ursprünglichen Titel.
Kontext und Geschichte
Thoreau saß eine Nacht im Gefängnis, weil er eine Steuer verweigerte, die die Sklaverei und den Krieg gegen Mexiko finanzierte, und daraus ist dieser Aufsatz entstanden. Der Titel hier ist der wirkliche: «Ziviler Ungehorsam» ist der Name, den man ihm nach seinem Tod gegeben hat, und der geblieben ist. Gandhi hat ihn in Südafrika gelesen und Martin Luther King an der Universität.
Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.
The broadest and most prevalent error requires the most disinterested virtue to sustain it. The slight reproach to which the virtue of patriotism is commonly liable, the noble are most likely to incur. Those who, while they disapprove of the character and measures of a government, yield to it their allegiance and support, are undoubtedly its most conscientious supporters, and so frequently the most serious obstacles to reform. Some are petitioning the State to dissolve the Union, to disregard the requisitions of the President. Why do they not dissolve it themselves,—the union between themselves and the State,—and refuse to pay their quota into its treasury? Do not they stand in the same relation to the State, that the State does to the Union? And have not the same reasons prevented the State from resisting the Union, which have prevented them from resisting the State? How can a man be satisfied to entertain an opinion merely, and enjoy it? Is there any enjoyment in it, if his opinion is that he is aggrieved? If you are cheated out of a single dollar by your neighbor, you do not rest satisfied with knowing that you are cheated, or with saying that you are cheated, or even with petitioning him to pay you your due; but you take effectual steps at once to obtain the full amount, and see that you are never cheated again. Action from principle,—the perception and the performance of right,—changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary, and does not consist wholly with any thing which was. It not only divides states and churches, it divides families; aye, it divides the individual, separating the diabolical in him from the divine.