La teoría de los sentimientos morales
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Texto limpio
- Extensión:
- ~120.000 palabras · 579 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAAdam Smith. (n.d.). La teoría de los sentimientos morales. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/adam-smith/the-theory-of-moral-sentiments
- MLAAdam Smith. "La teoría de los sentimientos morales." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/adam-smith/the-theory-of-moral-sentiments.
- ChicagoAdam Smith. La teoría de los sentimientos morales. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/adam-smith/the-theory-of-moral-sentiments.
De qué trata
El primer libro de Adam Smith, de 1759, donde explica cómo nace el juicio moral: no de la razón ni de un mandamiento, sino de la capacidad de ponerse en el lugar de otro.
Contexto e historia
El mecanismo es la simpatía, que aquí no significa compasión sino la facultad de imaginar lo que sentiríamos en la situación del otro. De esa operación sale el «espectador imparcial», la figura interior con la que contrastamos nuestra propia conducta y que hace de conciencia. Conviene leer este libro antes que «La riqueza de las naciones», y no después: durante mucho tiempo se habló de un «problema de Adam Smith», como si el autor de la simpatía y el del interés propio fueran incompatibles. Smith no lo veía así, y estuvo revisando esta obra hasta el año de su muerte, treinta años después de la otra. Era catedrático de filosofía moral, no economista: este es su libro central.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it. Of this kind is pity or compassion, the emotion which we feel for the misery of others, when we either see it, or are made to conceive it in a very lively manner. That we often derive sorrow from the sorrow of others, is a matter of fact too obvious to require any instances to prove it; for this sentiment, like all the other original passions of human nature, is by no means confined to the virtuous and humane, though they perhaps may feel it with the most exquisite sensibility. The greatest ruffian, the most hardened violator of the laws of society, is not altogether without it. As we have no immediate experience of what other men feel, we can form no idea of the manner in which they are affected, but by conceiving what we ourselves should feel in the like situation. Though our brother is upon the rack, as long as we ourselves are at our ease, our senses will never inform us of what he suffers. They never did and never can carry us beyond our own person, and it is by the imagination only that we can form any conception of what are his sensations. Neither can that faculty help us to this any other way, than by representing to us what would be our own, if we were in his case. It is the impressions of our own senses only, not those of his, which our imaginations copy. By the imagination we place ourselves in his situation, we conceive ourselves enduring all the same torments, we enter as it were into his body and become in some measure him, and thence form some idea of his sensations and even feel something which, though weaker in degree, is not altogether unlike them.…