SigPhiSigPhi

La rebelión de Kronstadt

Alexander Berkman

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~15.200 palabras · 72 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAAlexander Berkman. (n.d.). The Kronstadt Rebellion [La rebelión de Kronstadt]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/alexander-berkman/the-kronstadt-rebellion
  • MLAAlexander Berkman. The Kronstadt Rebellion [La rebelión de Kronstadt]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/alexander-berkman/the-kronstadt-rebellion.
  • ChicagoAlexander Berkman. The Kronstadt Rebellion [La rebelión de Kronstadt]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/alexander-berkman/the-kronstadt-rebellion.

Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.

De qué trata

El folleto que Berkman publicó en 1922 sobre el levantamiento de los marinos de Kronstadt y su represión.

Contexto e historia

En marzo de 1921 la guarnición de la base naval que había sido la vanguardia de Octubre se alzó pidiendo elecciones libres a los soviets, libertad de prensa para socialistas y anarquistas, y el fin de las requisas. El ejército tomó la fortaleza cruzando el hielo del golfo y los supervivientes fueron fusilados o deportados. Berkman estaba en Petrogrado y lo vivió de cerca; aquí recoge las proclamas y las fechas para contestar a la versión oficial, que decía que era una revuelta de guardias blancos pagada desde el extranjero. Es un texto de parte, escrito enseguida y con prisa, y es también uno de los documentos de primera mano que hicieron que el debate sobre Kronstadt no pudiera cerrarse. El diario «The Bolshevik Myth», del mismo autor, da el contexto entero.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
disappointment. The Communist State showed no intention of loosening the yoke. The same policies continued, with labor militarisation still further enslaving the people, embittering them with added oppression and tyranny, and in consequence paralising every possibility of industrial revival. The last hope of the proletariat was perishing: the con^ viction grew that the Communist Party was more interested in retaining political power than in saving the Revolution. The most revolutionary elements of Russia, the workers of Petrograd, were the first to speak out. They charged that, aside from other causes, Bolshevik centralisation, bureaucracy, and autocratic attitude toward the peasants and workers were directly responsible for much of the misery and suffering of the people. Many factories and mills of Petrograd had been closed, and the workers were literally starving. They called meetings to consider the situation. The meetings v^ere suppressed by the Government. The Petrograd proletariat, who had borne the brunt of the revolutionary struggles and whose great sacrifices and heroism alone had saved the city from Yudenitch, resented the action of the Government. Keeling against the methods employed by the Bolsheviki continued to grow, More meetings were called, with the same result. The Communists would make no concessions to the proletariat, while at the same time they were offering to compromise with the capi^ talists of Europe and America. The workers wxre indignant — they became aroused. To compel the Government to consider their demands, strikes were called in the Patronny munition works, the Trubotchny and Baltiyski mills, and in the Laferm factory. Instead of talking matters over with the dissatisfied workers, the** Workers' and Peasants' GoYern:= ment" created a v/ar=:time Komitet Oborony (Committee of Defense) with Zinoviev, the most hated man in Petrograd, as Chairman.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Alexander Berkman