SigPhiSigPhi

Historia de los animales

Aristóteles

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~130.000 palabras · 633 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAAristóteles. (n.d.). Historia de los animales. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals
  • MLAAristóteles. "Historia de los animales." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
  • ChicagoAristóteles. Historia de los animales. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.

De qué trata

La recopilación de Aristóteles de lo que se sabía y de lo que él mismo observó sobre los animales: el primer tratado de zoología que se ha conservado.

Contexto e historia

«Historia» aquí significa «indagación», no relato del pasado. El libro describe partes, hábitos, reproducción, alimentación y comportamiento de centenares de especies, y el método es lo que lo hace notable: Aristóteles disecciona, compara y clasifica, y cuando no ha visto algo lo dice o cita a quien se lo contó. Hay errores —hay muchos, algunos vienen de pescadores y criadores que lo informaron mal—, y hay observaciones que no volvieron a confirmarse hasta el siglo XIX, como la reproducción del pulpo o el desarrollo del embrión del pollo día a día. Darwin escribió que sus dioses de la ciencia eran niños de parvulario al lado del viejo Aristóteles.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
The following Translation of Aristotle's History of Animals has been made from the text of Schneider. In a work of considerable difficulty it is hardly possible entirely to avoid errors; but it is hoped that those which have escaped are neither numerous nor important. The notes of Schneider have been consulted throughout; and in places of difficulty the English translation by Taylor, the French of Camus, and the German of Strack, have been severally referred to. The work itself is the most ancient and celebrated contribution to science which has come down to us; and it is hardly possible, when we consider the means of observation which were accessible at the time, to imagine a work of more accurate observation. From the numerous quotations in which our author avails himself of the experience of his predecessors in the same field, as well as corrects their errors, there can be no doubt that Aristotle had the advantage of many works which have perished in the lapse of ages. In the Appendix to the present Translation will be found the Essay of Schneider on the sources whence Aristotle derived his knowledge of the animals he describes; and these sources, together with his own accurate observations, are probably sufficient to account for the correct knowledge of the history of animals displayed throughout the work. It is right, perhaps, to observe in this place, that Dr. Smith, in his Dictionary of Biography, speaks of the 'History of Animals' as partly the result of the royal liberality of Alexander; and doubtless Aristotle would gladly have introduced into his work any fresh materials which might have been made available to him either during his residence at the Macedonian court, or by the subsequent victories of Alexander in the East, if the information so obtained had reached Athens in sufficient time to be incorporated.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Aristóteles