SigPhiSigPhi

Sobre los sueños

Aristóteles

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~4840 palabras · 23 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAAristóteles. (n.d.). Sobre los sueños. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-dreams-aristotle
  • MLAAristóteles. "Sobre los sueños." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-dreams-aristotle.
  • ChicagoAristóteles. Sobre los sueños. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-dreams-aristotle.

De qué trata

Qué es un sueño, si no es percepción ni pensamiento. La respuesta: movimientos que quedan en los sentidos y siguen cuando el objeto ya no está.

Contexto e historia

Llama la atención por lo sobrio: en un mundo que leía los sueños como mensajes, Aristóteles da una explicación puramente física. La imagen de las ondas que siguen moviéndose cuando la piedra ya se ha hundido es suya. Forma parte de los Parva naturalia, los ocho textos breves que continúan el De anima aplicando su teoría a fenómenos concretos del cuerpo vivo. Se han transmitido como grupo y se leen mejor juntos.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
We must, in the next place, investigate the subject of the dream, and first inquire to which of the faculties of the soul it presents itself, i.e. whether the affection is one which pertains to the faculty of intelligence or to that of sense-perception; for these are the only faculties within us by which we acquire knowledge. If, then, the exercise of the faculty of sight is actual seeing, that of the auditory faculty, hearing, and, in general that of the faculty of sense-perception, perceiving; and if there are some perceptions common to the senses, such as figure, magnitude, motion, &c., while there are others, as colour, sound, taste, peculiar [each to its own sense]; and further, if all creatures, when the eyes are closed in sleep, are unable to see, and the analogous statement is true of the other senses, so that manifestly we perceive nothing when asleep; we may conclude that it is not by sense-perception we perceive a dream. But neither is it by opinion that we do so. For [in dreams] we not only assert, e.g. that some object approaching is a man or a horse which would be an exercise of opinion, but that the object is white or beautiful, points on which opinion without sense-perception asserts nothing either truly or falsely. It is, however, a fact that the soul makes such assertions in sleep. We seem to see equally well that the approaching figure is a man, and that it is white. [In dreams], too, we think something else, over and above the dream presentation, just as we do in waking moments when we perceive something; for we often also reason about that which we perceive. So, too, in sleep we sometimes have thoughts other than the mere phantasms immediately before our minds. This would be manifest to any one who should attend and try, immediately on arising from sleep, to remember [his dreaming experience].…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Aristóteles