Sobre la memoria y el recuerdo
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Texto limpio
- Extensión:
- ~6110 palabras · 29 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAAristóteles. (n.d.). Sobre la memoria y el recuerdo. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-memory-and-reminiscence
- MLAAristóteles. "Sobre la memoria y el recuerdo." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-memory-and-reminiscence.
- ChicagoAristóteles. Sobre la memoria y el recuerdo. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-memory-and-reminiscence.
De qué trata
Cómo se guarda una imagen del pasado y qué nos permite volver a encontrarla. Aristóteles distingue la memoria —tener la imagen— del recuerdo, que es ir a buscarla.
Contexto e historia
Es el primer texto que trata la memoria como un problema técnico y no como un don, y la distinción entre memoria y recuerdo está debajo de toda la psicología posterior del tema. También contiene las leyes de asociación —semejanza, contraste, contigüidad— que Hume retomaría dos mil años después. Forma parte de los Parva naturalia, los ocho textos breves que continúan el De anima aplicando su teoría a fenómenos concretos del cuerpo vivo. Se han transmitido como grupo y se leen mejor juntos.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
We have, in the next place, to treat of Memory and Remembering, considering its nature, its cause, and the part of the soul to which this experience, as well as that of Recollecting, belongs. For the persons who possess a retentive memory are not identical with those who excel in power of recollection; indeed, as a rule, slow people have a good memory, whereas those who are quick-witted and clever are better at recollecting. We must first form a true conception of these objects of memory, a point on which mistakes are often made. Now to remember the future is not possible, but this is an object of opinion or expectation (and indeed there might be actually a science of expectation, like that of divination, in which some believe); nor is there memory of the present, but only sense-perception. For by the latter we know not the future, nor the past, but the present only. But memory relates to the past. No one would say that he remembers the present, when it is present, e.g. a given white object at the moment when he sees it; nor would one say that he remembers an object of scientific contemplation at the moment when he is actually contemplating it, and has it full before his mind;-of the former he would say only that he perceives it, of the latter only that he knows it. But when one has scientific knowledge, or perception, apart from the actualizations of the faculty concerned, he thus 'remembers' (that the angles of a triangle are together equal to two right angles); as to the former, that he learned it, or thought it out for himself, as to the latter, that he heard, or saw, it, or had some such sensible experience of it. For whenever one exercises the faculty of remembering, he must say within himself, 'I formerly heard (or otherwise perceived) this,' or 'I formerly had this thought'.