SigPhiSigPhi

Sobre la locomoción de los animales

Aristóteles

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~9470 palabras · 45 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAAristóteles. (n.d.). Sobre la locomoción de los animales. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals
  • MLAAristóteles. "Sobre la locomoción de los animales." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.
  • ChicagoAristóteles. Sobre la locomoción de los animales. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.

De qué trata

Por qué los animales tienen las extremidades que tienen, y por qué siempre en número par.

Contexto e historia

Anatomía comparada antes de que existiera el nombre: relaciona la forma de las extremidades con la manera de desplazarse y con el entorno. Es uno de los textos donde más se ve al Aristóteles que sale al campo a mirar.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
We have now to consider the parts which are useful to animals for movement in place (locomotion); first, why each part is such as it is and to what end they possess them; and second, the differences between these parts both in one and the same creature, and again by comparison of the parts of creatures of different species with one another. First then let us lay down how many questions we have to consider. The first is what are the fewest points of motion necessary to animal progression, the second why sanguineous animals have four points and not more, but bloodless animals more than four, and generally why some animals are footless, others bipeds, others quadrupeds, others polypods, and why all have an even number of feet, if they have feet at all; why in fine the points on which progression depends are even in number. Next, why are man and bird bipeds, but fish footless; and why do man and bird, though both bipeds, have an opposite curvature of the legs. For man bends his legs convexly, a bird has his bent concavely; again, man bends his arms and legs in opposite directions, for he has his arms bent convexly, but his legs concavely. And a viviparous quadruped bends his limbs in opposite directions to a man's, and in opposite directions to one another; for he has his forelegs bent convexly, his hind legs concavely. Again, quadrupeds which are not viviparous but oviparous have a peculiar curvature of the limbs laterally away from the body. Again, why do quadrupeds move their legs criss-cross? We have to examine the reasons for all these facts, and others cognate to them; that the facts are such is clear from our Natural History, we have now to ask reasons for the facts. Part 2

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Aristóteles