Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2)
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~1680 palabras · 8 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APACharles Peirce. (n.d.). Baldwin Dictionary Definition of Pragmatic (1) and (2) Pragmatism [Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/charles-peirce/baldwin-dictionary-definition-of-pragmatic-1-and-2-pragmatism
- MLACharles Peirce. Baldwin Dictionary Definition of Pragmatic (1) and (2) Pragmatism [Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/charles-peirce/baldwin-dictionary-definition-of-pragmatic-1-and-2-pragmatism.
- ChicagoCharles Peirce. Baldwin Dictionary Definition of Pragmatic (1) and (2) Pragmatism [Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/charles-peirce/baldwin-dictionary-definition-of-pragmatic-1-and-2-pragmatism.
Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.
De qué trata
Las definiciones de «pragmático» y «pragmatismo» en el diccionario de Baldwin.
Contexto e historia
Dos entradas de enciclopedia (1902) que hacen mucho más de lo que su tamaño promete: Peirce fija qué entendía él por el término y se aparta del uso que le daba William James. De ahí que más tarde rebautizara su propia versión como «pragmaticismo», una palabra —decía— lo bastante fea como para estar a salvo de secuestradores.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
us towards something different from practical facts, namely, to general ideas, as the true interpreters of our thought. Nevertheless, the maxim has approved itself to the writer, after many years of trial, as of great utility in leading to a relatively high grade of clearness of thought. He would venture to suggest that it should always be put into practice with conscientious thoroughness, but that, when that has been done, and not before, a still higher grade of clearness of thought can be attained by remembering that the only ultimate good which the practical facts to which it directs attention can subserve is to further the development of concrete reasonableness; so that the meaning of the concept does not lie in any individual reaction at all, but in the manner in which those reactions contribute to that development. Indeed, in the article of 1878, above referred to, the writer practised better than he preached; for he applied the stoical maxim most unstoically, in such a sense as to insist upon the reality of the objects of general ideas in their generality. A widely current opinion during the last quarter of a century has been that reasonableness is not a good in itself, but only for the sake of something else. Whether it be so or not seems to be a synthetical question, not to be settled by an appeal to the principle of contradiction -- as if a reason for reasonableness were absurd. Almost everybody will now agree that the ultimate good lies in the evolutionary process in some way. If so, it is not in individual reactions in their segregation, but in something general or continuous. Synechism is founded on the notion that the coalescence, the becoming continuous, the becoming governed by laws, the becoming instinct with general ideas, are but phases of one and the same process of the growth of reasonableness. This is first shown to be true with mathematical exactitude in the field of logic, and is thence inferred to hold good metaphysically.…
Pregunta sobre esta obra¿De qué trata Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2)?Resume Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2) en pocas palabras¿Cuáles son las ideas clave de Definición del Diccionario Baldwin de «pragmático» (1) y «pragmatismo» (2)?
← Volver a Charles Peirce