Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero
- Idioma:
- latín
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Texto limpio · 5 pasajes ilegibles, excluidos de las respuestas
- Extensión:
- ~110.000 palabras · 510 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APACicerón. (n.d.). Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/cicero/academica-by-marcus-tullius-cicero
- MLACicerón. "Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/cicero/academica-by-marcus-tullius-cicero.
- ChicagoCicerón. Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/cicero/academica-by-marcus-tullius-cicero.
De qué trata
La versión inglesa de las «Académicas», para el lector; la citación académica debe apuntar al latín.
Contexto e historia
Escritas el 45 a. C., son el libro de Cicerón sobre si puede saberse algo: la defensa del escepticismo de la Nueva Academia, la escuela donde él se había formado. La disputa es con los estoicos, que sostenían que hay percepciones tan claras que no pueden engañar y que el sabio puede asentir a ellas con certeza; contra eso, Cicerón despliega los argumentos de Carnéades —los sueños, las ilusiones, los gemelos indistinguibles— para concluir que la certeza no se da, y que lo que queda no es el silencio sino lo probable: se puede vivir y decidir siguiendo lo verosímil, sin afirmarlo como cierto. Cicerón la reescribió entera al cabo de pocas semanas, y por eso hay dos ediciones, ninguna conservada completa. Es la fuente principal de todo el debate epistemológico helenístico, y cuando Agustín quiso combatir el escepticismo, fue contra este libro contra el que escribió.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
Since the work of Davies appeared in 1725, no English scholar has edited the _Academica_. In Germany the last edition with explanatory notes is that of Goerenz, published in 1810. To the poverty and untrustworthiness of Goerenz's learning Madvig's pages bear strong evidence; while the work of Davies, though in every way far superior to that of Goerenz, is very deficient when judged by the criticism of the present time. This edition has grown out of a course of Intercollegiate lectures given by me at Christ's College several years ago. I trust that the work in its present shape will be of use to undergraduate students of the Universities, and also to pupils and teachers alike in all schools where the philosophical works of Cicero are studied, but especially in those where an attempt is made to impart such instruction in the Ancient Philosophy as will prepare the way for the completer knowledge now required in the final Classical Examinations for Honours both at Oxford and Cambridge. My notes have been written throughout with a practical reference to the needs of junior students. During the last three or four years I have read the _Academica_ with a large number of intelligent pupils, and there is scarcely a note of mine which has not been suggested by some difficulty or want of theirs. My plan has been, first, to embody in an Introduction such information concerning Cicero's philosophical views and the literary history of the _Academica_ as could not be readily got from existing books; next, to provide a good text; then to aid the student in obtaining a higher knowledge of Ciceronian Latinity, and lastly, to put it in his power to learn thoroughly the philosophy with which Cicero deals.…