Carta a Heródoto
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~6950 palabras · 33 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APADiógenes Laercio. (n.d.). Letter to Herodotus [Carta a Heródoto]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/diogenes-laertius/letter-to-herodotus
- MLADiógenes Laercio. Letter to Herodotus [Carta a Heródoto]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/diogenes-laertius/letter-to-herodotus.
- ChicagoDiógenes Laercio. Letter to Herodotus [Carta a Heródoto]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/diogenes-laertius/letter-to-herodotus.
Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.
De qué trata
La Carta a Heródoto de Epicuro, tal como nos ha llegado: dentro de Diógenes Laercio.
Contexto e historia
Epicuro escribió trescientos rollos y no se conserva ninguno. Esta carta existe porque Diógenes Laercio la copió entera en el libro X de sus Vidas de los filósofos, en el siglo III. Por eso está archivada bajo Diógenes y no bajo Epicuro: **esta es la fuente de verdad**, y quien la cite debería citarla así. Es el resumen que el propio Epicuro hizo de la física atomista, para estudiantes que no podían leer la obra completa.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
Again, we must believe that smelling, like hearing, would produce no sensation, were there not particles conveyed from the object which are of the proper sort for exciting the organ of smelling, some of one sort, some of another, some exciting it confusedly and strangely, others quietly and agreeably. Moreover, we must hold that the atoms in fact possess none of the qualities belonging to things which come under our observation, except shape, weight, and size, and the properties necessarily conjoined with shape. For every quality changes, but the atoms do not change, since, when the composite bodies are dissolved, there must needs be a permanent something, solid and indissoluble, left behind, which makes change possible: not changes into or from the non-existent. but often through differences of arrangement, and sometimes through additions and subtractions of the atoms. Hence these somethings capable of being diversely arranged must be indestructible, exempt from change, but possessed each of its own distinctive mass and configuration. This must remain. For in the case of changes of configuration within our experience the figure is supposed to be inherent when other qualities are stripped of, but the qualities are not supposed, like the shape which is left behind, to inhere in the subject of change, but to vanish altogether from the body. Thus, then, what is left behind is sufficient to account for the differences in composite bodies, since something at least must necessarily be left remaining and be immune from annihilation. Again, you should not suppose that the atoms have any and every size, lest you be contradicted by facts; but differences of size must be admitted; for this addition renders the facts of feeling and sensation easier of explanation.…