Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Traducción:
- J. W. Swain
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~270.000 palabras · 1285 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAÉmile Durkheim. (n.d.). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life [Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa] (J. W. Swain, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life
- MLAÉmile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life [Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa]. Translated by J. W. Swain. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.
- ChicagoÉmile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life [Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa]. Translated by J. W. Swain. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.
Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.
De qué trata
El libro donde Durkheim busca la forma más simple de religión para entenderlas todas, y donde concluye que lo que una sociedad adora, sin saberlo, es ella misma.
Contexto e historia
Publicado en 1912. Toma como caso elemental el totemismo de los pueblos aborígenes australianos, y aquí hace falta una precisión honesta: Durkheim no estuvo nunca allí. Trabaja sobre etnografías ajenas, y ese material ha sido muy cuestionado después, tanto por su calidad como por el supuesto de que aquellas sociedades fueran «elementales». El argumento sociológico —lo sagrado como fuerza colectiva, el ritual como lo que la mantiene viva— se ha sostenido mucho mejor que el material sobre el que se construyó.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
the causes which called it into existence, though remaining active, are no longer perceived, except across a vast scheme of interpretations which quite transform them. Popular mythologies and subtile theologies have done their work: they have superimposed upon the primitive sentiments others which are quite different, and which, though holding to the first, of which they are an elaborated form, only allow their true nature to appear very imperfectly. The psychological gap between the cause and the effect, between the apparent cause and the effective cause, has become more considerable and more difficult for the mind to leap. The remainder of this book will be an illustration and a verification of this remark on method. It will be seen how, in the primitive religions, the religious fact still visibly carries the mark of its origins: it would have been well-nigh impossible to infer them merely from the study of the more developed religions. The study which we are undertaking is therefore a way of taking up again, _but under new conditions_, the old problem of the origin of religion. To be sure, if by origin we are to understand the very first beginning, the question has nothing scientific about it, and should be resolutely discarded. There was no given moment when religion began to exist, and there is consequently no need of finding a means of transporting ourselves thither in thought. Like every human institution, religion did not commence anywhere. Therefore, all speculations of this sort are justly discredited; they can only consist in subjective and arbitrary constructions which are subject to no sort of control. But the problem which we raise is quite another one. What we want to do is to find a means of discerning the ever-present causes upon which the most essential forms of religious thought and practice depend.…