Relecciones De Indis y De iure belli (Carnegie Classics, trad. Bate, 1917)
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Traducción:
- J. P. Bate
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Texto limpio
- Extensión:
- ~160.000 palabras · 759 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAFrancisco de Vitoria. (n.d.). Relecciones De Indis y De iure belli (Carnegie Classics, trad. Bate, 1917). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/francisco-de-vitoria/de-indis-et-de-iure-belli-relectiones-carnegie-classics-bate-tr-1917
- MLAFrancisco de Vitoria. "Relecciones De Indis y De iure belli (Carnegie Classics, trad. Bate, 1917)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/francisco-de-vitoria/de-indis-et-de-iure-belli-relectiones-carnegie-classics-bate-tr-1917.
- ChicagoFrancisco de Vitoria. Relecciones De Indis y De iure belli (Carnegie Classics, trad. Bate, 1917). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/francisco-de-vitoria/de-indis-et-de-iure-belli-relectiones-carnegie-classics-bate-tr-1917.
De qué trata
Las dos relecciones de Vitoria: sobre los indios americanos y sobre el derecho de guerra, en latín con traducción inglesa.
Contexto e historia
Hay que saber qué es una relectio y cómo nos ha llegado: era una lección solemne leída en la universidad de Salamanca, y Vitoria no publicó nunca nada. Estos textos son reconstrucciones hechas a partir de los apuntes de los estudiantes. La tesis es fuerte: sostiene que los indios eran verdaderos dueños de sus tierras, que ni la donación papal ni el descubrimiento daban título alguno para tomarlas, y que ser infiel o pecador no hace perder el dominio. De ahí arranca la discusión moderna sobre el derecho de los pueblos.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
The passage to he discussed is from St. Matthew s Gospel: “ Teach ali nations, baptizing them in the name of the F ather and Son and Holy Spirit,” last chapter. 1. 2. 3- 8. 9- SUMMARY OF THE FIRST SECTION. How a person in doubt on any matter, to obtain safety of conscience, should consuit those whose business it is to give instruction in such matters. After one in doubt has taken such ad vice he ought to follow what the wise have laid down, else he will not be safe. . , Whether one in doubt ought, consistently with safety of conscience, to tollow the advice given by the wise in a doubtful matter when they lay down that to be now lawful which in other circumstances is unlawful. Whether the Indian aborigines before the arrival of the Spamards were true owners in public and in private law; and whether there were among them any true princes and overlords. . Examination of the error of those who assert that persons living in mortal sin can not have ownership of anything at ali. Mortal sin does not preclude civil ownership of the true kind. Whether ownership is lost by reason of unbelief. , , . , The divine law does not make heresy a cause of forfeiture 01 the heretic s property. Whether heresy causes loss of ownership by human law. A heretic incurs the penalty of confiscation of his property as from the date of the commission of his offense. . But although the heretic’ s offense is patent, the nsc may not seize his property before condemnation. . , , , r c Even though condemnation issues after the heretic s death, conhscation of property dates back to the time of the commission of the offense, no matter who is vested with the property. . . , Sales, gifts, and ali other modes of alienation by a heretic are void as from the date of the commission of the offense, etc. .…