SigPhiSigPhi

El origen de la familia, la propiedad privada y el Estado

Friedrich Engels

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~68.800 palabras · 327 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAFriedrich Engels. (n.d.). The origin of the family, private property, and the state [El origen de la familia, la propiedad privada y el Estado]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state
  • MLAFriedrich Engels. The origin of the family, private property, and the state [El origen de la familia, la propiedad privada y el Estado]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state.
  • ChicagoFriedrich Engels. The origin of the family, private property, and the state [El origen de la familia, la propiedad privada y el Estado]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state.

Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.

De qué trata

El origen de la familia, la propiedad privada y el Estado (1884).

Contexto e historia

Escrito a partir de los cuadernos sobre el antropólogo Lewis Morgan que Marx dejó al morir. La tesis —que la familia monógama y el Estado aparecen con la propiedad y no son naturales— le dio al feminismo del siglo XX uno de sus argumentos centrales. La etnografía en que se apoya ha envejecido; el argumento no. Es una traducción inglesa. El original alemán de Engels no está en el catálogo.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
Although the latter may extend over thousands of years, we have no means of proving its existence by direct evidence. But once the descent of man from the Animal Kingdom is acknowledged, the acceptance of this stage of transition becomes inevitable. 2. Middle Stage: Commencing with the utilization of fish (including crabs, mollusks and other aquatic animals) and the use of fire. Both these things belong together, because fish becomes thoroughly palatable by the help of fire only. With this new kind of food, human beings became completely independent of climate and locality. Following the course of rivers and coastlines, they could spread over the greater part of the earth even in the savage state. The so-called palaeolithic implements of the early stone age, made of rough, unsharpened stones, belong almost entirely to this period. Their wide distribution over all the continents testifies to the extent of these wanderings. The unceasing bent for discovery, together with the possession of fire gained by friction, created new products in the lately occupied regions. Such were farinaceous roots and tubers, baked in hot ashes or in baking pits (ground ovens). When the first weapons, club and spear, were invented, venison was occasionally added to the bill of fare. Nations subsisting exclusively by hunting, such as we sometimes find mentioned in books, have never existed; for the proceeds of hunting are too uncertain. In consequence of continued precariousness of the sources of sustenance, cannibalism seems to arise at this stage. It continues in force for a long while. Even in our day, Australians and Polynesians still remain in this middle stage of savagery. 3. Higher Stage: Coming with the invention of bow and arrow, this stage makes venison a regular part of daily fare and hunting a normal occupation.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Friedrich Engels