SigPhiSigPhi

Reflexiones sobre la violencia (ed. 2)

Georges Sorel

Idioma:
inglés
Traducción:
T. E. Hulme
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~110.000 palabras · 541 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAGeorges Sorel. (n.d.). Reflexiones sobre la violencia (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence
  • MLAGeorges Sorel. "Reflexiones sobre la violencia (ed. 2)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
  • ChicagoGeorges Sorel. Reflexiones sobre la violencia (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.

De qué trata

El libro de 1908 en que Sorel defiende la huelga general no como una táctica sino como un «mito»: una imagen que mueve a los hombres a actuar aunque nunca haya de realizarse tal como se la imaginan.

Contexto e historia

Es uno de los textos más incómodos del corpus, y conviene decir por qué. Sorel venía del marxismo y lo encontraba demasiado racionalista: sostenía que las masas no se mueven por cálculos sino por imágenes totales, y que el sindicalismo revolucionario debía conservar su capacidad de conflicto en vez de negociarla. Distinguía la «violencia» proletaria de la «fuerza» del Estado, y despreciaba la democracia parlamentaria como un modo de apagar el conflicto. Estas ideas fueron recogidas tanto por la izquierda sindicalista como por el fascismo italiano, y el propio Sorel simpatizó con Lenin al final de su vida. Está en el corpus porque es una pieza real de la historia de las ideas, y hay que leerlo sabiendo adónde fue a parar.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
My dear Halevy — I should doubtless have left these studies buried in the bound volumes of a review if some friends, whose judgment I value, had not. thought that it would be a good thing to bring them before the notice of a wider public, as they serve to make better known one of the most singular social phenomena that history records. But it seemed to me that it would be necessary to give this public some additional explanations, since I cannot often expect to find judges as indulgent as you have been. When I published, in the Mouvement Socialiste, the articles which are now collected in this volume, I did not write with the intention of composing a book : I simply wrote down my reflections as they came into my mind. I knew that the subscribers to that review would have no difficulty in following me, since they were already famiHar with the theories, which for some years my friends and I had developed in its pages. But I am convinced that the readers of this book, on the contrary, will be very bewildered if I do not submit a kind of defence which will enable them to consider things from my own habitual point of view. In the course of our conversations, you have sometimes made remarks which fitted so well into the system of my own ideas that they often led me to investigate certain questions more thoroughly. I am sure that the reflections which I here submit to you, and which you have provoked, will be very useful to those who wish to read this book with profit. There are perhaps few studies in which the defects of my method of writing are more evident ; I have been frequently reproached for not respecting the rules of the art of writing, to which all our contemporaries submit, and for thus inconveniencing my readers by the disorder of my explanations. I have tried to render the text clearer by numerous corrections of detail, but I have not been able to make the disorder disappear.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Georges Sorel