La evolución creadora
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Con errores de escaneo (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano) · 10 pasajes ilegibles, excluidos de las respuestas
- Extensión:
- ~180.000 palabras · 844 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAHenri Bergson. (n.d.). Creative Evolution [La evolución creadora]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution
- MLAHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution [La evolución creadora]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
- ChicagoHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution [La evolución creadora]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.
De qué trata
La propuesta de Bergson de que la evolución no se explica ni por el azar ni por un plan previo, sino por un impulso —el élan vital— que va probando caminos y se reparte en direcciones divergentes.
Contexto e historia
Publicado en 1907, tuvo un éxito enorme fuera de la filosofía y lo convirtió en una celebridad; en 1927 le dieron el Nobel de literatura. La parte que ha resistido mejor no es el élan vital, que la biología nunca aceptó, sino la crítica del modo en que el entendimiento fabrica el tiempo: Bergson sostiene que el pensamiento, hecho para la acción, convierte la duración en una sucesión de instantes inmóviles, y que por eso no puede pensar lo que cambia.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
From this survival of the past it follows that consciousness cannot go through the same state twice. The circumstances may still be the same, but they will act no longer on the same person, since they find him at a new moment of his history. Our personality, which is being built up each instant with its accumulated experience, changes without ceasing. By changing, it prevents any state, although superficially identical with another, from ever repeating it in its very depth. That is why our duration is irreversible. We could not live over again a single moment, for we should have to begin by effacing the memory of all that had followed. Even could we erase this memory from our intellect, we could not from our will. Thus our personality shoots, grows and ripens without ceasing. Each of its moments is something new added to what was before. We may go further: it is not only something new, but something unforeseeable. Doubtless, my present state is explained by what was in me and by what was acting on me a moment ago. In analyzing it I should find no other elements. But even a superhuman intelligence would not have been able to foresee the simple indivisible form which gives to these purely abstract elements their concrete organization. For to foresee consists of projecting into the future what has been perceived in the past, or of imagining for a later time a new grouping, in a new order, of elements already perceived. But that which has never been perceived, and which is at the same time simple, is necessarily unforeseeable. Now such is the case with each of our states, regarded as a moment in a history that is gradually unfolding: it is simple, and it cannot have been already perceived, since it concentrates in its indivisibility all that has been perceived and what the present is adding to it besides. It is an original moment of a no less original history.