SigPhiSigPhi

El estudio de la sociología

Herbert Spencer

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~210.000 palabras · 980 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAHerbert Spencer. (n.d.). The Study of Sociology [El estudio de la sociología]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/herbert-spencer/the-study-of-sociology
  • MLAHerbert Spencer. The Study of Sociology [El estudio de la sociología]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/herbert-spencer/the-study-of-sociology.
  • ChicagoHerbert Spencer. The Study of Sociology [El estudio de la sociología]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/herbert-spencer/the-study-of-sociology.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

Un libro sobre por qué es difícil estudiar la sociedad: no por el método sino por quien la estudia.

Contexto e historia

Publicado en 1873. La parte que aguanta mejor es la lista de sesgos que Spencer enumera uno por uno: el patriótico, el de clase, el político, el teológico, el que viene de esperar que los hechos confirmen nuestra educación. Sostiene que en ninguna otra ciencia el observador forma parte tan íntimamente del objeto, y que por eso hacen falta precauciones que en física no hacen falta. Es de sus libros que menos ha envejecido, precisamente porque no depende de su sistema evolutivo.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
They suppose nothing more is required than to subscribe money for relieving it. On the one hand, they never trace the reactive effects which charitable donations work on bank accounts, on the surplus-capital bankers have to lend, on the productive activity which the capital now abstracted would have set up, on the number of labourers who would have re ceived wages and who now go without wrages — they do not perceive that certain necessaries of life have been withheld from one man who would have exchanged useful work for them, and given to another who perhaps persistently evades working. Nor, on the other hand, do they look beyond the immediate mitigation of misery. They deliberately shut their eyes to the fact that as fast as they increase the provision for those who live without labour, so fast do they increase the number of those who live without labour ; and that with an ever-increasing distribution of alms, there comes an ever-in creasing outcry for more alms. Similarly throughout all their political thinking. Proximate causes and proximate results are alone contemplated. There is scarcely any consciousness that the original causes are often numerous and widely differ ent from the apparent cause ; and that beyond each immedi ate result there will be multitudinous remote results, most of them quite incalculable. Minds in which the conceptions of social actions are thus rudimentary, are also minds ready to harbour wild hopes of benefits to be achieved by administrative agencies. In each such mind there seems to be the unexpressed postulate that every evil in a society admits of cure ; and that the cure lies within the reach of law. " Why is not there a better inspec tion of the mercantile marine ? " asked a correspondent of the Times the other day : apparently forgetting that within the preceding twelve months the power he invoked had lost two of its own vessels, and barely saved a third.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a Herbert Spencer