Julia, o la nueva Eloísa
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~310.000 palabras · 1496 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAJean-Jacques Rousseau. (n.d.). Eloisa or, A series of original letters [Julia, o la nueva Eloísa]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/eloisa-or-a-series-of-original-letters
- MLAJean-Jacques Rousseau. Eloisa or, A series of original letters [Julia, o la nueva Eloísa]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/eloisa-or-a-series-of-original-letters.
- ChicagoJean-Jacques Rousseau. Eloisa or, A series of original letters [Julia, o la nueva Eloísa]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/eloisa-or-a-series-of-original-letters.
Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.
De qué trata
Novela en cartas: Julie y su preceptor Saint-Preux se aman, la diferencia de estamento lo impide, y ella se casa con Wolmar e intenta rehacer la vida en torno al deber.
Contexto e historia
Apareció en 1761 con el título de Julie, ou la Nouvelle Héloïse y fue el libro más vendido del siglo: hay lectores documentados que escribieron a Rousseau llorando, preguntándole si Julie había existido de verdad. Esta es una traducción inglesa del siglo XVIII, donde la novela lleva el título de Eloisa; para citar a Rousseau, el texto es el francés.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
simple, if you will, but sensible, who mutually expressing the real sentiments of their hearts, have no intention to display their wit. They know and love each other too well for self-admiration to have any influence among them. They are children, and therefore think like children. They are not natives of France, how then can they be supposed to write correctly? They lived in solitude, and therefore could know but little of the world. Entirely filled with one single sentiment, they are in a constant delirium, and yet presume to philosophise. Would you have them know how to observe, to judge, and to reflect? No: of these they are ignorant; but they are versed in the art of love, and all their words and actions are connected with that passion. Their ideas are extravagant, but is not the importance which they give to these romantic notions more amusing than all the wit they could have displayed. They speak of every thing; they are constantly mistaken; they teach us nothing, except the knowledge of themselves; but in making themselves known, they obtain our affection. Their errors are more engaging than the wisdom of the wise. Their honest hearts, even in their transgressions, bear still the prejudice of virtue, always confident and always betrayed. Nothing answers their expectations; every event serves to undeceive them. They are deaf to the voice of discouraging truth: they find nothing correspond with their own feelings, and therefore, detaching themselves from the rest of the universe, they create, in their separate society, a little world of their own, which presents an entire new scene. N. I confess, that a young fellow of twenty, and girls of eighteen, though not; uninstructed, ought not to talk like philosophers, even though they may suppose themselves such. I own also, for this distinction has not escaped me, that these girls became wives of merit, and the young man a better observer.…