El niño y el currículo
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~7790 palabras · 37 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). The Child and the Curriculum [El niño y el currículo]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-dewey/the-child-and-the-curriculum
- MLAJohn Dewey. The Child and the Curriculum [El niño y el currículo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-dewey/the-child-and-the-curriculum.
- ChicagoJohn Dewey. The Child and the Curriculum [El niño y el currículo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-dewey/the-child-and-the-curriculum.
Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.
De qué trata
El niño y el programa escolar (1902): cómo disolver la falsa oposición entre seguir el interés del niño y enseñar una materia.
Contexto e historia
Corto y decisivo. Dewey sostiene que el dilema está mal planteado: la materia es la propia experiencia del niño vista desde el otro extremo del camino, y no algo ajeno a ella.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
well as the efficient and successful. The logical point of view, on the other hand, assumes that the development has reached a certain positive stage of fulfilment. It neglects the process and considers the outcome. It summarizes and arranges, and thus separates the achieved results from the actual steps by which they were forthcoming in the first instance. We may compare the difference between the logical and the psychological to the difference between the notes which an explorer makes in a new country, blazing a trail and finding his way along as best he may, and the finished map that is constructed after the country has been thoroughly explored. The two are mutually dependent. Without the more or less accidental and devious paths traced by the explorer there would be no facts which could be utilized in the making of the complete and related chart. But no one would get the benefit of the explorer's trip if it was not compared and checked up with similar wanderings undertaken by others; unless the new geographical facts learned, the streams crossed, the mountains climbed, etc., were viewed, not as mere incidents in the journey of the particular traveler, but (quite apart from the individual explorer's life) in relation to other similar facts already known. The map orders individual experiences, connecting them with one another irrespective of the local and temporal circumstances and accidents of their original discovery. Of what use is this formulated statement of experience? Of what use is the map? Well, we may first tell what the map is not. The map is not a substitute for a personal experience. The map does not take the place of an actual journey. The logically formulated material of a science or branch of learning, of a study, is no substitute for the having of individual experiences. The mathematical formula for a falling body does not take the place of personal contact and immediate individual experience with the falling thing.…
Pregunta sobre esta obra¿De qué trata El niño y el currículo?Resume El niño y el currículo en pocas palabras¿Cuáles son las ideas clave de El niño y el currículo?
← Volver a John Dewey