SigPhiSigPhi

El socialismo

John Stuart Mill

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~27.800 palabras · 132 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAJohn Stuart Mill. (n.d.). Socialism [El socialismo]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism
  • MLAJohn Stuart Mill. Socialism [El socialismo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism.
  • ChicagoJohn Stuart Mill. Socialism [El socialismo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

Capítulos póstumos sobre el socialismo: qué hay de justo en la crítica socialista y qué no funcionaría.

Contexto e historia

El Mill que los dos bandos prefieren olvidar. Acepta buena parte del diagnóstico socialista sobre la propiedad y el trabajo, y objeta por razones de libertad y de incentivos. Quedó inacabado: murió escribiéndolo.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
But it was also said that slavery, that despotism, that all the privileges of oligarchy were necessary. All the successive steps that have been made by the poorer classes, partly won from the better feelings of the powerful, partly extorted from their fears, and partly bought with money, or attained in exchange for support given to one section of the powerful in its quarrels with another, had the strongest prejudices opposed to them beforehand; but their acquisition was a sign of power gained by the subordinate classes, a means to those classes of acquiring more; it consequently drew to those classes a certain share of the respect accorded to power, and produced a corresponding modification in the creed of society respecting them; whatever advantages they succeeded in acquiring came to be considered their due, while, of those which they had not yet attained, they continued to be deemed unworthy. The classes, therefore, which the system of society makes subordinate, have little reason to put faith in any of the maxims which the same system of society may have established as principles. Considering that the opinions of mankind have been found so wonderfully flexible, have always tended to consecrate existing facts, and to declare what did not yet exist, either pernicious or impracticable, what assurance have those classes that the distinction of rich and poor is grounded on a more imperative necessity than those other ancient and long-established facts, which, having been abolished, are now condemned even by those who formerly profited by them? This cannot be taken on the word of an interested party.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a John Stuart Mill