SigPhiSigPhi

La esclavitud de las mujeres

John Stuart Mill

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~45.500 palabras · 216 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAJohn Stuart Mill. (n.d.). La esclavitud de las mujeres. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-stuart-mill/the-subjection-of-women
  • MLAJohn Stuart Mill. "La esclavitud de las mujeres." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-stuart-mill/the-subjection-of-women.
  • ChicagoJohn Stuart Mill. La esclavitud de las mujeres. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/john-stuart-mill/the-subjection-of-women.

De qué trata

La esclavitud femenina (1869): la desigualdad entre los sexos es un resto de la ley del más fuerte, no un hecho natural.

Contexto e historia

Escrito con Harriet Taylor, y el texto feminista más importante escrito por un hombre en el siglo XIX. El argumento central sigue siendo difícil de responder: nadie puede saber qué hay de «natural» en las mujeres porque ninguna ha vivido nunca en libertad.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.) THE SUBJECTION OF WOMEN BY JOHN STUART MILL LONDON LONGMANS, GREEN, READER, AND DYER LONDON: SAVILL, EDWARDS AND CO., PRINTERS, CHANDOS STREET, COVENT GARDEN. CHAPTER I. The object of this Essay is to explain as clearly as I am able, the grounds of an opinion which I have held from the very earliest period when I had formed any opinions at all on social or political matters, and which, instead of being weakened or modified, has been constantly growing stronger by the progress of reflection and the experience of life: That the principle which regulates the existing social relations between the two sexes--the legal subordination of one sex to the other--is wrong in itself, and now one of the chief hindrances to human improvement; and that it ought to be replaced by a principle of perfect equality, admitting no power or privilege on the one side, nor disability on the other. The very words necessary to express the task I have undertaken, show how arduous it is. But it would be a mistake to suppose that the difficulty of the case must lie in the insufficiency or obscurity of the grounds of reason on which my conviction rests. The difficulty is that which exists in all cases in which there is a mass of feeling to be contended against. So long as an opinion is strongly rooted in the feelings, it gains rather than loses in stability by having a preponderating weight of argument against it.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a John Stuart Mill