Cartas y sermones (incluido el Tomo a Flaviano)
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Traducción:
- C. L. Feltoe
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~210.000 palabras · 1006 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APALeón I el Grande. (n.d.). Letters and Sermons (incl. the Tome to Flavian) [Cartas y sermones (incluido el Tomo a Flaviano)] (C. L. Feltoe, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/leo-i/letters-and-sermons-incl-the-tome-to-flavian
- MLALeón I el Grande. Letters and Sermons (incl. the Tome to Flavian) [Cartas y sermones (incluido el Tomo a Flaviano)]. Translated by C. L. Feltoe. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/leo-i/letters-and-sermons-incl-the-tome-to-flavian.
- ChicagoLeón I el Grande. Letters and Sermons (incl. the Tome to Flavian) [Cartas y sermones (incluido el Tomo a Flaviano)]. Translated by C. L. Feltoe. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/leo-i/letters-and-sermons-incl-the-tome-to-flavian.
Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.
De qué trata
Cartas y sermones de León Magno, entre ellos el Tomo a Flaviano, la carta que fija cómo debe entenderse que Cristo sea Dios y hombre a la vez.
Contexto e historia
El Tomo es del 449 y tuvo una consecuencia inmediata: en el concilio de Calcedonia, en 451, se leyó en voz alta y los obispos lo aclamaron diciendo que Pedro había hablado por boca de León. La fórmula de las dos naturalezas en una persona que salió de ahí es la que aún define la cristología de la mayor parte de las iglesias —y la que provocó la separación de las que no la aceptaron. Los sermones son otra cosa: breves, pensados para ser dichos, y útiles para ver cómo se predicaba en la Roma del siglo V.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
oftenest hitherto in the Eastern) portion of His Church. Politically, intellectually, and theologically the period in which this great character grew up, lived and worked, was one of transition: the Roman Empire, learning and thought, paganism were each alike at the last gasp, and neither in Church nor State was there any other at all of Leo's caliber. This consideration will account for the wonderful influence, partly for good and partly for bad, which his master-mind and will was permitted to exercise on the after-ages of Christendom. During his early manhood the Pelagian controversy was raging, and it is thought that the acolyte name Leo, whom Augustine mentions in his letters on this subject as employed by pope Zosimus to carry communications between Rome and the African church, is the future Pope. Under Celestine, who was pope from 422 to 432, he was archedeacon of Rome, and he seems already to have made a name for himself: for Cassian, the Gallican writer whom he had urged to write a work on the Incarnation, in yielding to his suggestion, calls him "the ornament of the Roman Church and of the Divine ministry," and S. Cyril (in 431, the date of the Council of Ephesus) appeals to Leo (as Leo has himself recorded in Letter CXIX., chap. 4) to procure the pope's support in stopping the ambitious designs of Juvenal, bishop of Jerusalem. Under the next pope, Sixtus (432-440), we hear of him in Prosper' s Chronicon (under the year 439) again in connexion with Pelagianism: he seems to have stirred up the vigilance of the pope against the crafty designs of one Julius of Eclanum, who, having been deprived of his bishopric for holding that heresy, was attempting to be restored without full proof of orthodoxy.