SigPhiSigPhi

Considerations on the Causes of the Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans

Montesquieu

Idioma:
inglés
Traducción:
Jehu Baker
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~190.000 palabras · 884 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAMontesquieu. (n.d.). Considerations on the Causes of the Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/montesquieu/considerations-on-the-causes-of-the-grandeur-and-decadence-of-the-romans
  • MLAMontesquieu. "Considerations on the Causes of the Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/montesquieu/considerations-on-the-causes-of-the-grandeur-and-decadence-of-the-romans.
  • ChicagoMontesquieu. Considerations on the Causes of the Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/montesquieu/considerations-on-the-causes-of-the-grandeur-and-decadence-of-the-romans.

De qué trata

El libro donde Montesquieu explica por qué Roma creció y por qué cayó, y sostiene que no fue la fortuna sino causas que pueden enumerarse.

Contexto e historia

Publicado en 1734, catorce años antes de El espíritu de las leyes, se lee como su ensayo previo: aquí prueba con un caso concreto el método que luego aplicará a todo. La frase que se le cita es que si una batalla arruinó un estado, había una causa general que hacía que aquel estado debiera perecer por una sola batalla. Es también una obra política encubierta: quien hablaba de la decadencia de Roma hablaba de la monarquía francesa, y sus lectores lo sabían.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
revision and emendation recently made — was finislied in 1876. The subject, however, is one against which time runs but slowly — if at all. It win be seen that the book is by no means a mere translation of Montesquieu's treatise; but that, beyond this, the Romans are used as a nexus for all antiquity, and the general movement of the world's civilization sought to be inferred. There must be errors ; but, in view of the nature and difficulties of the task undertaken, it seems obvious that criticism should be considerate and candid — no more is asked. The Notes which have been contributed by my- self are duly indicated as such ; those which are inclosed in 'brackets have been supplied by the French editors; aU others are Montesquieu's. Belleville, Illinois, March IS, 1882. GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Translator's Inteoduction 9 Idea of " the Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans " — from the French of La Harpe 15 Chap. I. — The Beginnings of Rome. — Her Wara. . 19 Note by the Translator 31 II. — Art of War among the Romans 48 Note by the Translator 51 III. — How the Romans were able to aggrandize themselves. ... 61 Note by the Translator • 66 IV. — ^The Gauls. — Pyrrhus. — Comparison of Carthage and Rome. — ^War with Hannibal 76 Note by the Translator 91 V. — State of Greece, of Macedon, of Syria and Egypt, aft§r the abasement of Carthage 107 Note by the Translator 124 VI. — Policy adopted by the Romans for the conquest of all Nations 129 Note by the Translator 146 VII. — Mithridates. — How he was able to resist the Romans. . . . 165 Note by the Translator 160 VIII.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Montesquieu