SigPhiSigPhi

Consideraciones intempestivas (ed. 2)

Nietzsche

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~31.800 palabras · 151 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APANietzsche. (n.d.). Consideraciones intempestivas (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/nietzsche/schopenhauer-as-educator
  • MLANietzsche. "Consideraciones intempestivas (ed. 2)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/nietzsche/schopenhauer-as-educator.
  • ChicagoNietzsche. Consideraciones intempestivas (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/nietzsche/schopenhauer-as-educator.

De qué trata

Schopenhauer como educador (1874): no es un libro sobre Schopenhauer sino sobre qué significa tener un maestro.

Contexto e historia

Nietzsche explica menos la filosofía de Schopenhauer que el efecto que le hizo encontrarla, y de ahí sale la pregunta que recorre toda su obra: cómo se llega a ser el que se es. Es también un ataque a la universidad como fábrica de eruditos inofensivos. Es una de las cuatro Consideraciones intempestivas (Unzeitgemässe Betrachtungen, 1873-1876). En el catálogo hay tres por separado y también la Parte I entera. Es una traducción inglesa de la edición completa dirigida por Oscar Levy (1909-1913), la que está en dominio público. Tiene más de un siglo y se le nota. El original es ALEMÁN, y al citar hay que seguir el original: en el catálogo hay dos, Also sprach Zarathustra y Der Wille zur Macht; del resto, aquí solo está la traducción.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
being, only once on this earth; and by no extraordinary chance will such a marvellously picturesque piece of diversity in unity as he is, ever be put together a second time. He knows this, but hides it like an evil conscience;—and why? From fear of his neighbour, who looks for the latest conventionalities in him, and is wrapped up in them himself. But what is it that forces the man to fear his neighbour, to think and act with his herd, and not seek his own joy? Shyness perhaps, in a few rare cases, but in the majority it is idleness, the "taking things easily," in a word the "tendency to sloth," of which the traveller spoke. He was right; men are more slothful than timid, and their greatest fear is of the burdens that an uncompromising honesty and nakedness of speech and action would lay on them. It is only the artists who hate this lazy wandering in borrowed manners and ill-fitting opinions, and discover the secret of the evil conscience, the truth that each human being is a unique marvel. They show us, how in every little movement of his muscles the man is an individual self, and further—as an analytical deduction from his individuality—a beautiful and interesting object, a new and incredible phenomenon (as is every work of nature), that can never become tedious. If the great thinker despise mankind, it is for their laziness; they seem mere indifferent bits of pottery, not worth any commerce or improvement.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Nietzsche