SigPhiSigPhi

Consideraciones intempestivas, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner en Bayreuth)

Nietzsche

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~63.400 palabras · 301 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APANietzsche. (n.d.). Consideraciones intempestivas, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner en Bayreuth). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth
  • MLANietzsche. "Consideraciones intempestivas, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner en Bayreuth)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth.
  • ChicagoNietzsche. Consideraciones intempestivas, parte I (David Strauss; Richard Wagner en Bayreuth). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth.

De qué trata

El primer volumen de las Consideraciones intempestivas: contra David Strauss, y Richard Wagner en Bayreuth.

Contexto e historia

El ataque a Strauss es el Nietzsche polemista en estado puro: no le discute la teología sino la prosa, y el retrato del «filisteo de la cultura» —el burgués con estudios que confunde lo que le gusta con lo que está bien— todavía escuece. **Nota:** Richard Wagner en Bayreuth aparece también como obra suelta. No es un duplicado: el volumen y el ensayo solo son ediciones distintas y se quedan los dos. Es una traducción inglesa de la edición completa dirigida por Oscar Levy (1909-1913), la que está en dominio público. Tiene más de un siglo y se le nota. El original es ALEMÁN, y al citar hay que seguir el original: en el catálogo hay dos, Also sprach Zarathustra y Der Wille zur Macht; del resto, aquí solo está la traducción.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
Public opinion in Germany seems strictly to forbid any allusion to the evil and dangerous consequences of a war, more particularly when the war in question has been a victorious one. Those writers, therefore, command a more ready attention who, regarding this public opinion as final, proceed to vie with each other in their jubilant praise of the war, and of the powerful influences it has brought to bear upon morality, culture, and art. Yet it must be confessed that a great victory is a great danger. Human nature bears a triumph less easily than a defeat; indeed, it might even be urged that it is simpler to gain a victory of this sort than to turn it to such account that it may not ultimately prove a serious rout. But of all evil results due to the last contest with France, the most deplorable, perhaps, is that widespread and even universal error of public opinion and of all who think publicly, that German culture was also victorious in the struggle, and that it should now, therefore, be decked with garlands, as a fit recognition of such extraordinary events and successes. This error is in the highest degree pernicious: not because it is an error,--for there are illusions which are both salutary and blessed,--but because it threatens to convert our victory into a signal defeat. A defeat?--I should say rather, into the uprooting of the "German Mind" for the benefit of the "German Empire." Even supposing that the fight had been between the two cultures, the standard for the value of the victor would still be a very relative one, and, in any case, would certainly not justify such exaggerated triumph or self-glorification. For, in the first place, it would be necessary to ascertain the worth of the conquered culture. This might be very little; in which case, even if the victory had involved the most glorious display of arms, it would still offer no warrant for inordinate rapture.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Nietzsche