SigPhiSigPhi

Eutifrón

Platón

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~9050 palabras · 43 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAPlatón. (n.d.). Euthyphro [Eutifrón]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/euthyphro
  • MLAPlatón. Euthyphro [Eutifrón]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/euthyphro.
  • ChicagoPlatón. Euthyphro [Eutifrón]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/euthyphro.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

Camino del juicio que lo condenará, Sócrates le pregunta a un hombre que está denunciando a su propio padre qué es la piedad. No sobrevive ninguna de las cinco respuestas.

Contexto e historia

El primero de los cuatro diálogos del proceso de Sócrates, y el origen de una pregunta que la teología no ha acabado de masticar: ¿lo santo es santo porque los dioses lo aman, o los dioses lo aman porque es santo? Planteada aquí hacia el 380 a. C., todavía se llama el dilema de Eutifrón.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
SOCRATES: But what differences are there which cannot be thus decided, and which therefore make us angry and set us at enmity with one another? I dare say the answer does not occur to you at the moment, and therefore I will suggest that these enmities arise when the matters of difference are the just and unjust, good and evil, honourable and dishonourable. Are not these the points about which men differ, and about which when we are unable satisfactorily to decide our differences, you and I and all of us quarrel, when we do quarrel? (Compare Alcib.) EUTHYPHRO: Yes, Socrates, the nature of the differences about which we quarrel is such as you describe. SOCRATES: And the quarrels of the gods, noble Euthyphro, when they occur, are of a like nature? EUTHYPHRO: Certainly they are. SOCRATES: They have differences of opinion, as you say, about good and evil, just and unjust, honourable and dishonourable: there would have been no quarrels among them, if there had been no such differences--would there now? EUTHYPHRO: You are quite right. SOCRATES: Does not every man love that which he deems noble and just and good, and hate the opposite of them? EUTHYPHRO: Very true. SOCRATES: But, as you say, people regard the same things, some as just and others as unjust,--about these they dispute; and so there arise wars and fightings among them. EUTHYPHRO: Very true. SOCRATES: Then the same things are hated by the gods and loved by the gods, and are both hateful and dear to them? EUTHYPHRO: True. SOCRATES: And upon this view the same things, Euthyphro, will be pious and also impious? EUTHYPHRO: So I should suppose.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a Platón