SigPhiSigPhi

Gorgias

Platón

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~58.500 palabras · 278 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAPlatón. (n.d.). Gorgias. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/gorgias
  • MLAPlatón. Gorgias. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/gorgias.
  • ChicagoPlatón. Gorgias. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/plato/gorgias.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

Contra los maestros de retórica: si el orador persuade sin saber, ¿qué está vendiendo en realidad? El diálogo gira hacia la pregunta más grave de si es mejor cometer injusticia o padecerla.

Contexto e historia

El diálogo donde Sócrates dice que preferiría sufrir el daño antes que hacerlo, y donde Calicles le replica que la justicia es un invento de los débiles para frenar a los fuertes — un argumento que Nietzsche recogería veintitrés siglos después. La discusión más dura de Platón sobre el poder.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
the art of politics, which attends on the soul, having a legislative part and a judicial part; and another art attending on the body, which has no generic name, but may also be described as having two divisions, one of which is medicine and the other gymnastic. Corresponding with these four arts or sciences there are four shams or simulations of them, mere experiences, as they may be termed, because they give no reason of their own existence. The art of dressing up is the sham or simulation of gymnastic, the art of cookery, of medicine; rhetoric is the simulation of justice, and sophistic of legislation. They may be summed up in an arithmetical formula:— Tiring: gymnastic:: cookery: medicine:: sophistic: legislation. And, Cookery: medicine:: rhetoric: the art of justice. And this is the true scheme of them, but when measured only by the gratification which they procure, they become jumbled together and return to their aboriginal chaos. Socrates apologizes for the length of his speech, which was necessary to the explanation of the subject, and begs Polus not unnecessarily to retaliate on him. “Do you mean to say that the rhetoricians are esteemed flatterers?” They are not esteemed at all. “Why, have they not great power, and can they not do whatever they desire?” They have no power, and they only do what they think best, and never what they desire; for they never attain the true object of desire, which is the good. “As if you, Socrates, would not envy the possessor of despotic power, who can imprison, exile, kill any one whom he pleases.” But Socrates replies that he has no wish to put any one to death; he who kills another, even justly, is not to be envied, and he who kills him unjustly is to be pitied; it is better to suffer than to do injustice. He does not consider that going about with a dagger and putting men out of the way, or setting a house on fire, is real power.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a Platón